- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Try a SAR to see what they have on you:Chips wrote:Hello, I have lost my ILR stamped passport many years ago that I received from qualifying through parent's marriage to a UK citizen. I have no other formal documents regarding my status, nothing.
If I submit NTL forms or TOC (not sure which to go for) I assume they would get rejected as no previous evidence can be presented, aside from records of my continuous residence.
I also never received a BRP or Home Office letter. How exactly do I go about this? I am about to get my replacement passport from my country of origin (s.American) which in itself is an arduous task, but I am unsure as how to acquire a BRP or ILR stamp without the requisite paperwork that they ask for, which I don't have.
Would they hold records of issuing me ILR or is my cause hopeless?
Any help appreciated, Thanks.
Not sure. Try all options - see what you get back.Chips wrote:I have no HO, port reference numbers or previous passport numbers to submit, only mine and family's name. Will this suffice as the only information I can provide?
I am not sure which request to make either, I'm guessing the Home Office files (Port, NASS) option?
Finally, do I enclose my only passport or just a photocopy?
Many thanks.
You shouldn't travel before sorting out the problem with NTL.Chips wrote:Do I just need to ask for it back or provide flight tickets to prove im leaving??
*** Update ***: Lapsed settlement65 wrote:In light of the analysis set out in paragraphs [40] to [49] above, I am satisfied that counsel for the respondent was wrong to assert that the onus was on the petitioner to vouch that his leave had not lapsed. For the reasons which I have set out, I consider that to state this proposition so starkly is an oversimplification of what ought properly to be a more nuanced approach. I am also satisfied that the respondent has not considered the proper question at any stage in this evolving process and I am satisfied that she has not weighed what the preponderance of the information provided by the petitioner tends to establish about absence from the United Kingdom for any continuous period of two years.