Tier 2 - Am I eligible to apply for ILR?
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2015 8:49 pm
Hello,
I've just signed up here because in a couple of weeks it will be 5 years since I arrived in London for my job. I hadn't really looked into the ILR details until now (and I realize I should have done so earlier!), but better late than never I guess.
I have a Tier 2 - General visa sponsored by my employer. I entered the country on 15th Sep 2010 on a 3-year visa. Then in 2013, I had my employer get a new one(extension?) and now it expires in October of 2016.
My main question is if I am eligible to apply for ILR status when I've been out of the country for more than 180 days the past 12 months. As an example, I was outside of the country for almost 6 months during the first half of this year mostly due to work. About 5.5 weeks of the total 22-week or so stay I'd say was due to personal reasons (vacation, flying out early to be with family for Christmas). The rest of the days were for work and I'm sure my employer would have no problem proving this. HOWEVER, I'm getting mixed messages from people/the Internet. On a XXX website where it was explaining why some people might want to go with an extension rather than applying for an ILR status, the first reason was because you spent more than 180 days outside of the country (even if it was for work). Some people here I have noticed confirmed they got their ILR status despite being outside of the country for more than 180 days.
Does anyone know what the actual rule is? I'm going to go through my passport, work emails, etc. to get an accurate figure, but just from mid-December of last year till now, I can confirm I was out for about 190 days already (and I have another business trip planned in a couple of weeks).
I'm hitting myself over the head for willing to stay out of the country for so long now! Foolish me! I was there working for most of the period, but I see now that in terms of applying for ILR status, I might as well have been on holiday!
Thank you for your time.
I've just signed up here because in a couple of weeks it will be 5 years since I arrived in London for my job. I hadn't really looked into the ILR details until now (and I realize I should have done so earlier!), but better late than never I guess.

I have a Tier 2 - General visa sponsored by my employer. I entered the country on 15th Sep 2010 on a 3-year visa. Then in 2013, I had my employer get a new one(extension?) and now it expires in October of 2016.
My main question is if I am eligible to apply for ILR status when I've been out of the country for more than 180 days the past 12 months. As an example, I was outside of the country for almost 6 months during the first half of this year mostly due to work. About 5.5 weeks of the total 22-week or so stay I'd say was due to personal reasons (vacation, flying out early to be with family for Christmas). The rest of the days were for work and I'm sure my employer would have no problem proving this. HOWEVER, I'm getting mixed messages from people/the Internet. On a XXX website where it was explaining why some people might want to go with an extension rather than applying for an ILR status, the first reason was because you spent more than 180 days outside of the country (even if it was for work). Some people here I have noticed confirmed they got their ILR status despite being outside of the country for more than 180 days.
Does anyone know what the actual rule is? I'm going to go through my passport, work emails, etc. to get an accurate figure, but just from mid-December of last year till now, I can confirm I was out for about 190 days already (and I have another business trip planned in a couple of weeks).
I'm hitting myself over the head for willing to stay out of the country for so long now! Foolish me! I was there working for most of the period, but I see now that in terms of applying for ILR status, I might as well have been on holiday!
Thank you for your time.