| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
archigabe Moderator
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 1352 Location: Dublin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |

|
 |
archigabe Moderator
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 1352 Location: Dublin
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I met with a solicitor today and I was informed that it is important to raise the legal challenge within 3 months of the issue of refusal letter issued by the Department of Justice,otherwise it is not possible to appeal through the courts.
I am also writing a list of solicitors who deal with immigration law in Dublin. This list was given to me by the Immigrant Council,so I am not promoting anyone.
Immigration Solicitors in Dublin:
1. Kevin Brophy
Brophy Solicitors,
38 Parliament Street Temple Bar,
Dublin 2
01-6797930
2.Brendan Toale
MacGeehin,Toale and Nagle Solicitors
10 Prospect Road
Harts Corner
Glasnevi
Dublin 9
01 830 7799
3.Conor O'Brian
16 North King Street,
Dublin 7
Phone 01 8734201
4.Derek Stewart
Stewart and Co.
12 Parliament Street,
Dublin2
01 6775011
Last edited by archigabe on Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:14 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yankeegirl Sage
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 689 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Archigabe,
Out of curiosity, does the denial letter state that on there? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
archigabe Moderator
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 1352 Location: Dublin
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, that's what the solicitor I met told me.It's apparently something like the statute of limitations. The denial letter is just a standard letter saying that we are being denied residency because we didnt live in another E.U country. The one we received didnt say anything about asking us to leave the country, just that they might review the decision based on the court case.
The scary thing that I heard was that the Decision the supreme court makes based on the Kumar case might affect everyone who's in the High Court. So, it doesnt matter if every thing about you is different from the Kumar case, the decision will apply to you on the same basis as Kumar who was here illegally.
I'd like to encourage everyone not to lose heart or be disheartened. They might try to kick you out, but you will always have your spouse and you can always make a new life in another Country.The important thing is that you are together.
Last edited by archigabe on Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:11 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
archigabe Moderator
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 1352 Location: Dublin
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Contact Migrant Rights Center Ireland (www.mrci.ie) and Immigration Council Ireland (www.immigrantcouncil.ie) as well. They have helpful and concrete suggestions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ark Junior Member
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:06 pm Post subject: Re: Enforcement of European Union rights for Citizens in Ire |
|
|
Anyone tried filling a complaint through the SOLVIT system? I'm trying to fill it but having a bit of trouble with some of the info... anyone with experience on that system? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lex Newbie
Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 7 Location: Cork Ireland
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 4:16 pm Post subject: Statute of limitations in judicial review. |
|
|
Hi
I am an Immigration Solicitor and a new member. The High Court will not accept Judicial Review in relation to EU refusals unless they are brought within 6 months from the date of the refusal letter.
Take care
Colm Stanley |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
archigabe Moderator
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 1352 Location: Dublin
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks for letting us know. I'd advice anyone before contacting a solicitor to get references from the immigrant council or the Migrant rights center. The main issue in our opinion is that the Irish 656 is discriminatory against E.U citizens compared to Irish citizens. It places an undue burden on E.U citizens which is not expected from Irish citizens to live in another E.U country...This is contrary to the spirit and letter of the E.U free movement laws whose aim is that Citizens from other E.U countries should have no disadvantage compared to local citizens. Unless you can get to strike down the Irish S.I 656 as unconstitutional, discriminatory and placing an undue burden on E.U citizen families I don't see much change happening. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lex Newbie
Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 7 Location: Cork Ireland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:20 pm Post subject: Distinguising Kumar |
|
|
Hi from Cork
It is still possible to distinguish other judicial review cases from Kumar.
The legal position in Ireland in relation to precedents is that one High Court judgement is not necessarily bound by a prior decision of the High Court.
Therefore it is possible to be granted Leave in a judicial review despite Kumar having lost his case in the High Court.
The real problem is that the High Court has upheld the legalityof the Irish regs and the Supreme Court has this to consider in the near future.
Colm Stanley |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
archigabe Moderator
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 1352 Location: Dublin
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe there is a clear case for the misinterpretation by the Irish government of the power of their national legislation (S.I 656/2006) over E.U families
From Directive 2004/38/EC, it is clear that national legislation only applies to extended family members (in-laws,cousins) and not spouses. The fascists at DOJ have no right to use their national legislation to refuse E.U1 applications for spouses.
Here's the relevant part of the Directive 2004/38/EC.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:229:0035:0048:EN:PDF
| Quote: | ''(5)The right of all Union citizens to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States should, if it is to be exercised under objective conditions of freedom and dignity, be also granted to their family members, irrespective of nationality. For the purposes of this Directive, the definition of ‘family member’ should also include the registered partner if the legislation of the host Member State treats registered partnership as equivalent to marriage.
(6)In order to maintain the unity of the family in a broader sense and without prejudice to the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of nationality, the situation of those persons who are not included in the definition of family members under this Directive, and who therefore do not enjoy an automatic right of entry and residence in the host Member State, should be examined by the host Member State on the basis of its own national legis-lation, in order to decide whether entry and residence could be granted to such persons, taking into consideration their relationship with the Union citizen or any other circumstances, such as their financial or physical dependence on the Union citizen. |
Their rejection of E.U1 applications and their application of Irish S.I 656 on E.U families is completely illegal and I think we should be able to claim damages. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lex Newbie
Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 7 Location: Cork Ireland
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:11 pm Post subject: Damages in refusal of EU residency cases. |
|
|
| Damages have been sought in a number of recent judicial review "leave" cases where EU residency has been refused. It would be important in these cases to be able to show actual damages. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ark Junior Member
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:20 pm Post subject: Re: Damages in refusal of EU residency cases. |
|
|
| Lex wrote: | | Damages have been sought in a number of recent judicial review "leave" cases where EU residency has been refused. It would be important in these cases to be able to show actual damages. |
Well, I think a year of inactivity is damage enough - No income produced means that we had to manage only with my own, which has been really bit tight in all honesty. She's a highly qualified professional just wasting away without being able to practice - you know how hard is to get in the loop after having so much time of inactivity? Most places won't take references that are more than two years old, and we're getting there.
Plus, and more importantly, this whole ordeal and uncertainty has made a number on my wife - she developed chronic general anxiety disorder to the point of having an internal lump on her throat and is under prescribed meds now. (Xanax, namely)
(For more info about general anxiety disorder follow this link)
I can evidence that easily, it was diagnosed by an Irish GP and have all the prescriptions - plus she didn't have any anxiety issues or history before moving to Ireland, which can be proved easily as well as we do happen to carry her medical history from the USA. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
archigabe Moderator
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 1352 Location: Dublin
|
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You know, your wife as an American citizen has a real power to change things here for E.U 1 spouses. She could send off some letters addressed to Bertie Ahern, the local T.D's, letters to Editor Metro Ireland,Irish times,'Irish Lobby for Immigration Reform' in the U.S that unless they change their policy in Ireland she is going actively lobby her congressman and senators in the U.S to encourage the I.C.E to pursue every illegal irish immigrant/asylum seeker in the U.S and their families to get them jailed or deported.
If they start getting deported, guess who's going to get the blame? Bertie Ahern and his cronies will be blamed for mishandling things here.
Revenge is not the best attitude to have, but we have to use every legal means we have to get our point across when the Government doesnt care or chooses to be unjust.
Irish Lobby for Immigration Reform USA
ILIR Headquarters
875 Avenue of the Americas,
Suite 2100, NY, NY 10001
Tel: 718 598 7530 | Fax: 212-244-3344
nyoffice@irishlobbyusa.org
http://www.irishlobbyusa.org/
http://www.irishvoices.blogspot.com/
http://www.nysun.com/article/28835 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ark Junior Member
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm, not a bad idea... although I'd probably take a different approach.
I'll try to compose a draft and see how it comes out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
archigabe Moderator
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 1352 Location: Dublin
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| She doesn't actually have to go through with it. The Irish American lobby seems to have Bertie Ahern's ear and if she wrote to them that she would do her best to get them arrested in the U.S unless they can convince Ahern to change his government's policy regarding her situation in Ireland. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ark Junior Member
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| archigabe wrote: | | She doesn't actually have to go through with it. The Irish American lobby seems to have Bertie Ahern's ear and if she wrote to them that she would do her best to get them arrested in the U.S unless they can convince Ahern to change his government's policy regarding her situation in Ireland. |
Yeah, but it'd be bad if it hits the media and makes us look like complete asshats  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
archigabe Moderator
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 1352 Location: Dublin
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ark wrote: | | archigabe wrote: | | She doesn't actually have to go through with it. The Irish American lobby seems to have Bertie Ahern's ear and if she wrote to them that she would do her best to get them arrested in the U.S unless they can convince Ahern to change his government's policy regarding her situation in Ireland. |
Yeah, but it'd be bad if it hits the media and makes us look like complete asshats  |
Im surprised you are more worried about being unpopular than apply pressure on the Irish government.
Hope it works out for you both, and your wife gets well!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ark Junior Member
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| archigabe wrote: | Im surprised you are more worried about being unpopular than apply pressure on the Irish government.
Hope it works out for you both, and your wife gets well!  |
If it comes to gathering public support, last thing I want to seem is someone just trying to get their own situation sorted by screwing others - Plus its not only about public image but a bit about moral standpoint.
There's ways of getting things sorted, or applying pressure, without becoming part of what's wrong to begin with.
She's getting a bit better though, thanks  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
astartes Junior Member
Joined: 12 Jul 2008 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The "fascists" at the DoJ are just run-of-the mill Irish nationalists, they repeatedly made it clear, like other Irish institutions, that the "lads" expect to have special rights in Europe while exploiting and abusing other Europeans.
This attitude is very common within the Irish political and administrative system, though it is never openly stated in public.
The best course of action for those who seek damages is to encourage the European Commission to take legal action against the RoI in the ECJ, for this and related issues. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scrudu Sage
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 648 Location: Dublin, Ireland
|
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
... and he's back ... resurrecting old posts, with unhelpful angry rhetoric .... the absence was just too good to last i guess!
| Quote: | | asartes: The "fascists" at the DoJ are just run-of-the mill Irish nationalists, they repeatedly made it clear, like other Irish institutions, that the "lads" expect to have special rights in Europe while exploiting and abusing other Europeans. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|