- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
If you have any document such as Tenancy document in which both your names are there, then you can submit that as the proof of cohabitation. This should span for last 2 years.mithai420 wrote:Thanks dear friend.
I do currently hold Tier 1 General visa and will complete 5 yrs in June so planning to apply in June itself .
I have dependent's ie wife and son ( born at UK ) , wife is working too.
Please advise or let me know , if you need any further information.
Thanks
As per rules you are supposed to submit proof of cohabitation from three different sources like utility bill, tenancy agreement, bank statement, credit card bills, medical cards, pay slips, and so on. List is exhaustivetknayak wrote:If you have any document such as Tenancy document in which both your names are there, then you can submit that as the proof of cohabitation. This should span for last 2 years.mithai420 wrote:Thanks dear friend.
I do currently hold Tier 1 General visa and will complete 5 yrs in June so planning to apply in June itself .
I have dependent's ie wife and son ( born at UK ) , wife is working too.
Please advise or let me know , if you need any further information.
Thanks
If the tenancy document does not reflect both your names, you can submit yours and your wife's bank statements for last two years which should show the same address.
This is a requirement for SET(M) applicants and not for SET(O) applicants. Section 10A of the form does not explicitly ask to provide evidence from 3 different sources. You can submit evidence from one source only. This has to span across two years though.khalidmirza wrote: As per rules you are supposed to submit proof of cohabitation from three different sources like utility bill, tenancy agreement, bank statement, credit card bills, medical cards, pay slips, and so on. List is exhaustive
I 100 percent agree with you that it is requirement for Set(M) application form. Since Set(O) form does not explicitly define the type of documents, submitting these documents from one source is your personal interpretation and liable to be rejected. Therefore it is suggested to be on safe side instead of being sorry later. At least you can argue on the basis of Set(M) form requirements in case of objection.tknayak wrote:This is a requirement for SET(M) applicants and not for SET(O) applicants. Section 10A of the form does not explicitly ask to provide evidence from 3 different sources. You can submit evidence from one source only. This has to span across two years though.khalidmirza wrote: As per rules you are supposed to submit proof of cohabitation from three different sources like utility bill, tenancy agreement, bank statement, credit card bills, medical cards, pay slips, and so on. List is exhaustive
I understand your difficulty. My suggestion is try these documentsitsravi wrote:Hi All,
I am currently on Tier1 visa, completing 5 years in March, planning to apply in March with my wife and son as dependant, but I don't have proof for cohabitant for whole 2 years. I changed address 8 months back, for this 8 months period, I have some proof which I can show, but don't have much for the previous address. Do I need to show these documents for both addresses, for the previous address, I have tenancy agreement on both (myself and my wife's name), but her name does not appear on any other document, not even on council bill or any other utility bill.
Please advise.
Regards,
But i heard this is only for tier 1 and tier 2 dependant . i am on WP holder and my wife has WP Dependant visa ?khalidmirza wrote:I suppose YES. You need to show cohabitation proof if you applying for your spouse ILRadil2009 wrote:dear all,
what about WP holder and WP dependent also need to submit proof of cohabitation when going to apply ILR?
The ground for rejection has to be doubly stronger than the criteria on which the visa is approved. Rejection cannot happen on the basis of an ambiguous requirement. If the dependant application is made at the same time as the main applicant, the case worker has the opportunity to verify several documents pertaining to the main applicant and he looks for at least one set of cohabitation document where it can be established that both applicants lived together.khalidmirza wrote: I 100 percent agree with you that it is requirement for Set(M) application form. Since Set(O) form does not explicitly define the type of documents, submitting these documents from one source is your personal interpretation and liable to be rejected. Therefore it is suggested to be on safe side instead of being sorry later. At least you can argue on the basis of Set(M) form requirements in case of objection.
Any point based visa needs 2 years cohabitation except those who are covered by JR.adil2009 wrote:But i heard this is only for tier 1 and tier 2 dependant . i am on WP holder and my wife has WP Dependant visa ?khalidmirza wrote:I suppose YES. You need to show cohabitation proof if you applying for your spouse ILRadil2009 wrote:dear all,
what about WP holder and WP dependent also need to submit proof of cohabitation when going to apply ILR?
please help me in this regard.
The ground for rejection has to be doubly stronger than the criteria on which the visa is approved. Rejection cannot happen on the basis of an ambiguous requirement. If the dependant application is made at the same time as the main applicant, the case worker has the opportunity to verify several documents pertaining to the main applicant and he looks for at least one set of cohabitation document where it can be established that both applicants lived together.[/quotetknayak wrote:khalidmirza wrote: I 100 percent agree with you that it is requirement for Set(M) application form. Since Set(O) form does not explicitly define the type of documents, submitting these documents from one source is your personal interpretation and liable to be rejected. Therefore it is suggested to be on safe side instead of being sorry later. At least you can argue on the basis of Set(M) form requirements in case of objection.