Hi all

This decision is me and my other half - https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2018/2378.html

We were told in Court - basically threatened - that they may use other means to deny people after Bangor. The Lords and Lady are clear re that.

The Home Office were absolutely CRUSHED in the RCJ

For those who are stuck in the system on the 2006 BS.

Despite Bobek the dearly beloved* Home Office are still holding out re the Judgement in Banger.

It comes out on the 12th July.

*Legally speaking they are prejudice against British people - uncontested . I'm using the UN definition

Well Banger is of no relevance. Save for the specific Surinder Singh questions, the Supreme court has more or less addressed the appeal right question. Well Banger is now their only ground so they think it is. Less than three weeks away, no final bundle, them jostling for an adjournment based ...

Long story short, we're due in the Court of Appeal in a few weeks. Our UT case was EA/02400/2015 We've never lost a case and are representing ourselves. The Home Office are officially dearly beloved (using UN definitions) at a minimum prejudiced (using the wording used in both the First and Upper ...

It is strange your appeal was allowed in 2015, and Sala became an obstacle, when Sala only came out in the Autumn of 2016. One does not know what the supreme court will say. However there is an Opinion in Banger coming up on the 15-03-18. So whatever the supreme court say, may not mark the ...

Obie wrote: ↑

Fri Feb 16, 2018 11:51 am

Well Banger will certainly have an effect on cases which falls under the 2016 EEA Regulations, therefore it is indeed relevant.

Why only the 2016 ?

thanks for updating Obie CA will proceed the pending stay cases either the would wait for Banger case to handedover the final judgement. As my appealed stay pending due to SM Algeria. What it would be the result in my case which was heard in FTT (sep 2016) & allowed my appeal. so where i m standing ...