Tier 1 visa application and it's complexities

[sky100]

I think the UKBA are toiling with the future of the Tier 1 entrepreneur applicants, they feel that immigrants are a bunch trying to exploit the system. A visa application gets refused and given a right of appeal, section 3c and 3d automatically extends the time limit and maintains any conditions attached to the original limited leave.
The condition allows the applicant to work or set up in business pending a decision on the application. Now this is my argument, why would the courts not accept additional documents which were missing in the initial application when section 3c and 3d allows the applicant to work and continue trading in their business,knowing fully well that the economic activities of these migrant fuel the UK economy( paying taxes and wages)

An applicant who has invested in business (pending appeal)with evidence should not be denied the visa simply because the entrepreneur applications are complex. Where I feel the courts can dismiss an appeal is when the applicant has not been able to show evidence of trading at the time of the appeal hearing.

My opinion is that once an application is refused and undergoing the appeal process the appellant should not be able to work until the appeal process is concluded, that way the UKBA rule of applicant cannot produce additional evidence in court can be justified. At the moment the human rights of genuine applicants are being deprived