ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

FLR O from new born baby - online appointment

Only for the UK Skilled Worker visas, formerly known as Tier 2 visa route

Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha

Locked
noor1034
BANNED
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:38 am

FLR O from new born baby - online appointment

Post by noor1034 » Tue May 04, 2010 9:29 pm

Im in UK on 5 year WP. Im planning to apply for dependent visa for my baby. Im thinking to use same day PEO service.

However, Im not sure how should I get online appointment. UKBA online appointment is not allowing me as It says applicant should be 16+ year old.

Should I use my own details to get appointment for my baby ?

Any advice much appreciated.

Thanks

geriatrix
Moderator
Posts: 24755
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: does it matter?
United Kingdom

Re: FLR O from new born baby - online appointment

Post by geriatrix » Wed May 05, 2010 12:19 am

noor1034 wrote: UKBA online appointment is not allowing me as It says applicant should be 16+ year old.
In other words, you cannot 'cause it is not allowed - unless you are applying for FLR and including the child as a dependent in your (own) application.

regards

noor1034
BANNED
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:38 am

Re: FLR O from new born baby - online appointment

Post by noor1034 » Wed May 05, 2010 7:53 am

Thanks for your reply.

So it means I can not book same day appointment for my baby?

geriatrix
Moderator
Posts: 24755
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: does it matter?
United Kingdom

Post by geriatrix » Wed May 05, 2010 9:24 am

:shock:
I believe my response above is self-explanatory.


regards

noor1034
BANNED
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:38 am

Post by noor1034 » Wed May 05, 2010 9:43 am

sushdmehta wrote::shock:
I believe my response above is self-explanatory.


regards
I still could not understand your reply. Sorry.

Locked