BC possible problem
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:30 pm
Hi
My husband applied for his ILR back in Feb, and successfully it was granted. We have been married for 8 years. Unfortunately we had been going through some problems for a while so after he recieved his ILR we decided to separate, although we remained living in the same house, until a few weeks ago. I applied for single persons tax credits shortly after he recieved his ILR. I am still supporting his BC application next Feb as we are still good friends (I know that our separation will not be a problem when applying for BC as long as I support the application,I have already called Home Office and found out this info).
What I am worried about is that home office will see that I made a tax credits claim shortly after he recieved his ILR and think that he obtained his ILR deceptively, thus invalidating his ILR and BC chances. I wonder if anybody could give me some advice.
Do Home office look into the supporting applicants tax file or concentrate on the affairs of the applicant only?
Many thanks
My husband applied for his ILR back in Feb, and successfully it was granted. We have been married for 8 years. Unfortunately we had been going through some problems for a while so after he recieved his ILR we decided to separate, although we remained living in the same house, until a few weeks ago. I applied for single persons tax credits shortly after he recieved his ILR. I am still supporting his BC application next Feb as we are still good friends (I know that our separation will not be a problem when applying for BC as long as I support the application,I have already called Home Office and found out this info).
What I am worried about is that home office will see that I made a tax credits claim shortly after he recieved his ILR and think that he obtained his ILR deceptively, thus invalidating his ILR and BC chances. I wonder if anybody could give me some advice.
Do Home office look into the supporting applicants tax file or concentrate on the affairs of the applicant only?
Many thanks