- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
why she asked that if you have >90 absence in a stretch ? if you had said yes then what she has done ? any idea ?rahulk wrote:I applied and received ILR in Croydon today.
My case was fairly straightforward: WP + WP + Tier 1. All with the same employer. I brought along and submitted the following documents:
- passport
- application form
- photographs
- P60s for all years worked on the above visas
- payslips and bank statements to achieve points for Tier 1 (note this was fewer than 12 months)
- Life in the UK test pass letter
- copies of all of the above except the application form
My appointment was for 10:30a. I got there at 10a and waited 15 mins or so before going through Heathrow style security. After they asked for the appointment reference number and then I had to stand in another queue to go to the first window. This queue took about 20 mins.
At the first window, the woman asked for my form, reference number and passport. She asked if I had been out of the country for longer than 90 days at any point in the five years and if my WP employer and Tier 1 employer were the same. She also said she would switch my appointment to include biometrics which took a bit of tapping on her computer. After this she gave me the ticket (time stamped 10:47a) and I went up to the 1st floor to pay. She also stamped my form as 'VALID'.
Payment was straightforward (I used a debit card). Shortly after, my ticket # was called to go to a window on the 1st floor. Here I was asked again for the form, photographs, passport and proof of payment (which is a tiny slip of paper given to you at the payment window). Some details were entered into the computer and then I was given back all the documents and told to go to the second floor and wait to be called to give biometric data.
This was when the long wait occurred. I must have waited till 12:15/12:30 before I was called. The lady said that they were backlogged. The biometric process is straightforward. They ask if you have provided such information before. Then fingerprints and a photograph are electronically taken and you sign a declaration form. At this point, she informed me that the data was being sent to a police database to be checked and once the results came back I would be called to a window on the second floor.
I probably waited till about 1:15p before I was called. This was the actual meeting with the caseworker. I handed him all my documents and made some comments re: my passport and submitting less than 12 months of bank statements/ payslips. He was not perturbed by any of this. He flipped through all the info quickly and said everything looked fine but he needed some time to check. He also asked what the longest period I had spent outside the UK in the last 5 years was (I had 1.5 pages of absences). I offered the copies and he said hang on to them, I'll call you when the check is done. Down came the shutter and I went and sat and waited. (This entire conversation may have taken 15 mins tops).
About 45 mins later, I was called and was told that the application had been approved. He explained the process of delivering the biometric card. I gave him the copies and he returned the original docs. Interestingly, no letter is given saying ILR has been approved. This is NOT explicitly stated in the biometric permit letter I was given. I asked specifically about this and he just said that those were the documents they provided. He did give me a generic letter (without my name etc. on it) saying the application had been approved and the proof of that was the biometric residence permit.
All in all, except for the waiting, this was not a bad experience. The staff is polite, courteous and un-harried. So are the other applicants. If I were to do it again, I'd bring food as the little snack booth on the 2nd floor is vile and expensive. I also didn't see much of an option to leave and return as tickets were being called constantly.
The only thing that surprised me were 1) the # of families/ children, 2) the # of solicitors/ agents, 3) the waiting around (its difficult to listen to music, watch a rubbish on the iPad etc. as u have to be alert for your ticket # being called).
I hope this is helpful as I have found other postings.
If he had said yes, the CW would have asked for proof that the absence was for business purposes or for compelling reasons. Failure to prove this would mean that his 5 year counter was reset when he would have exceeded the 90 days outside UK, and his ILR rejected (but no payment taken).fahadz1 wrote: why she asked that if you have >90 absence in a stretch ? if you had said yes then what she has done ? any idea ?
Hi parasiteslost!parasiteslost wrote:
If he had said yes, the CW would have asked for proof that the absence was for business purposes or for compelling reasons. Failure to prove this would mean that his 5 year counter was reset when he would have exceeded the 90 days outside UK, and his ILR rejected (but no payment taken).
And if he had said yes and had sufficient proof, his application would have most probably been deferred to a postal application.
my ilr is due in couple of months. day by day i can see on immigration boards that they are becomming strict and i dont want to read that they ask if your absence is >90 do post it that will be upset for many people including meramay wrote:Hi parasiteslost!parasiteslost wrote:
If he had said yes, the CW would have asked for proof that the absence was for business purposes or for compelling reasons. Failure to prove this would mean that his 5 year counter was reset when he would have exceeded the 90 days outside UK, and his ILR rejected (but no payment taken).
And if he had said yes and had sufficient proof, his application would have most probably been deferred to a postal application.
Is it your guess or your experience? How do you know that?
Based on several posts in this forum especially one post saying the HO distributed an internal email recently advising applications with absence issues be processed as postal.ramay wrote:
Hi parasiteslost!
Is it your guess or your experience? How do you know that?
How long ago do they started to ask about absence>90 days at Croydon reception?parasiteslost wrote:
If he had said yes, the CW would have asked for proof that the absence was for business purposes or for compelling reasons. Failure to prove this would mean that his 5 year counter was reset when he would have exceeded the 90 days outside UK, and his ILR rejected (but no payment taken).
Postal application that means they will send it to Durham? Or it will stays at Croydon and very very senior people for few months will be thinking to be or not to be!!??........Is it takes same time as a postal to Durham?Is that extra quid do any difference?
And if he had said yes and had sufficient proof, his application would have most probably been deferred to a postal application.
that also stupid its written that what is over 90/180 can be aggregated but no absence must be more than 90/180 ..Time spent here may exceptionally be aggregated, and continuity not insisted upon, for cases where:There have been longer absences abroad .....No single absence abroad must be for more than three months at a time and any periods of long absence must not total more than six months'
when? this year?fahadz1 wrote:well i have read from one guy whom they ask that is your absence is > 90 on reception.
i read last week and it happend last weekramay wrote:when? this year?fahadz1 wrote:well i have read from one guy whom they ask that is your absence is > 90 on reception.
Also 2 weeks ago my friend was in Sollihul for ILR with 4 months businessfahadz1 wrote: i read last week and it happend last week
this >90 absence is a big issue now. if i knew i had never accept to take project. anyway recently i applied job which required Security Clearanceramay wrote:Also 2 weeks ago my friend was in Sollihul for ILR with 4 months businessfahadz1 wrote: i read last week and it happend last week
trip.CW asked him send it by post as they do not have senior case workers..what is over 90 have to be approved by SEO or grade 7 and he asked what about over 180 she answered that is not a big problem...!!Sorry I can't proceed..with your case..
What is the problem for them your>90 abscence?Did they check your passport?fahadz1 wrote:.. anyway recently i applied job which required Security Clearance
and when they find out that i was away for more than 90 days they refused to do security check. I told them i can provide police certificate of my country etc they said no they cant do ? so until next 3 years i cannot apply for SC jobs ..
or closed....no body knows what will happened in the next day..,wrote: I did mistake i dont want any one to do it .... after 5 years whole world is open for you so just wait.....
What is the problem for them your>90 absence..Did they check your passport?fahadz1 wrote: anyway recently i applied job which required Security Clearance
and when they find out that i was away for more than 90 days they refused to do security check. I told them i can provide police certificate of my country etc they said no they cant do ? so until next 3 years i cannot apply for SC jobs .
respect your compassion...HO must think like you...I strongly advise if any one is planing to go more than 90 days please stop it as it will result in a lot of stress and pain and if you refused it will be more pain ...
I did mistake i dont want any one to do it.
or closed.... no body knows what will hapened in the next day,immigration rules become worse and worse, climate is changing,WW3,2012?.... after 5 years whole world is open for you so just wait.....
there is some UK law i think which states that >90 days a person will no longer be a continued resident that what i think.ramay wrote:What is the problem for them your>90 absence..Did they check your passport?fahadz1 wrote: anyway recently i applied job which required Security Clearance
and when they find out that i was away for more than 90 days they refused to do security check. I told them i can provide police certificate of my country etc they said no they cant do ? so until next 3 years i cannot apply for SC jobs .
respect your compassion...HO must think like you...I strongly advise if any one is planing to go more than 90 days please stop it as it will result in a lot of stress and pain and if you refused it will be more pain ...
I did mistake i dont want any one to do it.
or closed.... no body knows what will hapened in the next day,immigration rules become worse and worse, climate is changing,WW3,2012?.... after 5 years whole world is open for you so just wait.....
I mean those people in HO have no compassion..they do not feel your painfahadz1 wrote: what u mean '
respect your compassion...HO must think like you...'
i know abt rules thats y i'm saying dont break rules at any cost other wise u will feel the pain which i'm feeling in this economic climate.
Could you send me a link please.I asked several times on the forum with no resultthere is some UK law i think which states that >90 days a person will no longer be a continued resident that what i think.