- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
The case you are referring to "galathea" was one where the application was submitted before the new rules came into effect and a decision provided after. It would be incorrect to make conclusions on how it was assessed with the limited information provided or the circumstances around that application.kumardar wrote:According to the refusal for galathea, it looks like they may take any 12 consecutive months(backward from application date) to calculate absences.
If application date is 11 November 2012 then consecutive 12-months can be:
Year 1 11 November 2012 to 10 November 2011
Year 2 11 November 2011 to 10 November 2010
Year 3 11 November 2010 to 10 November 2009
Year 4 11 November 2009 to 10 November 2008
Year 5 11 November 2008 to 10 November 2007
or it can be any 12 month periods for example:
Year 1 11 October 2012 to 10 October 2011
Year 2 11 October 2011 to 10 October 2010
Year 3 11 October 2010 to 10 October 2009
Year 4 11 October 2009 to 10 October 2008
Year 5 11 October 2008 to 10 November 2007
Am I correct? If this is correct then the rules seems to be more strict compared to previous rules.
=================================================
galathea wrote:
I was applying before new rules came in force so didn't calculate anything. But they applied new rules to me, and calculated the absences over 12 months selecting those months so that it would maximize my absences - to go above 180 days (their method was not tied neither to the calendar (Jan to Jan) nor to my application date (Apr to Apr)). Can't quote particular periods as the file is on my work computer.
While your absences do come within the 180 day annual threshold, you do appear to have a lot of absences (totally over 300 days). The 160 day single absence where you were not paid in the UK would be up for scruitinity IMHO. As yet I haven't seen an application approval posted on this forum, where there have been large absences which when taken together would be considered a large number, but when split across the 12 consecutive month periods is not so large. Therefore it's not an area that is clear for me to comment on at the moment.vd_ilr wrote:Hi cs95tdg / Senior members,
This is my details
Work Permit Stamped : 14 May 2007
Date of entry to UK : 09 Sep 2007
Tier 1 (General) Stamped : 12 June 2008
Tier 1 (General) Extension: 21 June 2011
Below are my absences from UK for the 5 year period from the date of my application (assuming that I apply by PEO in March 2013).
Year 1: 20 March 2013 - 21 March 2012 = 38 days - UK Paid annual leave - Tier 1 (General)
Year 2: 20 March 2012 - 21 March 2011 = 28 days - UK Paid annual leave - Tier 1 (General)
Year 3: 20 March 2011 - 21 March 2010 = 134 days - Paid in India - Tier 1 (General) 50 consecutive + 84 days consecutive.
Year 4: 20 March 2010 - 21 March 2009 = 87 days - Paid in India - Tier 1 (General)
Year 5: 20 March 2009 - 21 March 2008 = 30 days - UK Paid annual leave - Tier 1 (General)
I was sent back to India by my company in 2010 and was paid in INR. Quit the company in Aug 2010 and joined UK company in Sep 2010 (with an unpaid gap of 12 days).
See below dates of exit and entry to UK (dates inclusive). I have more than 180 days absence in year 2010, however if I take absences from the date of application then both 180 days and 90 days consecutive absences are not breached.
Exit : Entry
02 Sep 2012 to 16 Sep 2012 - 15 days (paid annual leave)
21 April 2012 to 13 May 2012 - 23 days (paid annual leave)
25 June 2011 to 22 July 2011 - 28 days (paid annual leave)
17 July 2010 to 04 Sep 2010 - 50 days (paid in india)
04 Jan 2010 to 12 June 2010 - 160 days (paid in india)
17 July 2009 to 27 July 2009 - 11 days (paid annual leave)
27 Nov 2008 to 26 Dec 2008 - 30 days (paid annual leave)
I have a letter from ex-employer that in 2010 I was working in offshore (India) due to 'project requirements'. Also the letter confirms my UK paid annual leaves.
1) Do I still have to show any letter for my absence in 2010 - 'compelling or compassionate reasons'? All my absences were while i was on Tier 1 Visa.
2) For question 6.2 from SET(O) form - "Since then have you had any absences from the UK? If yes, give the dates you left
and returned to the UK and the reason for the absence in the spaces below."
Is it ok to mention "Work related absence" for my absences during 2010? For all others I am going to mention "Annual Leave"
1) The first statement is indeed incorrect as they have used the word "any". Note but Immigration rules are what you should comply with and they take precendence over what is published (possibly incorrectly) on any UKBA website pages or guidance notes.kumardar wrote:The below statement on the UKBA site is completely misleading as it says any 12 consecutive months in 5 year period.- http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/visas ... ettlement/
During the continuous residence period, you cannot be outside the UK for more than 180 days in any 12 consecutive months.
Also the below statement from guidance says its any of the 5, 2, 3, or 4 consecutive 12 month periods (don't know what is the reason they have mentioned 2, 3, or 4)
Dear Sir/Madam,
In the light of the recent changes to the immigration rules, question D2 of the SET(O) form is no longer relevant and will be amended at the next available opportunity.
Kind regards
Ann Woodall |Operational Policy and Rules| Blue zone, 5th Floor|Capital Building |Old Hall St |Liverpool L3 9PP
Correct if your absence was more than 180 days in one year, you have to give a reason which is serious and compelling with some support docs(to prove), had she taken those docs with her the first time it wont have been a problem + the change in rules helped get application got approved tooShace wrote:My colleague went to Sri lanka for 6 months on maternity Jan 2012-June 2012 and she came back and applied for ILR in october 2012
and got refused, because of the 180 day rule, she went in person and she managed to explain the the reason for her absence was
due to maternity.
UKBA refused the application and gave her an option to prove her absence was genuine, she got a letter from the
hospital from SL and got her ILR last week, thats after 4 months wait.
I personally believe even though there is a rule on absence it still applied individual basis.