Page 1 of 1
ILR SET (O)- 90 days rule no more ?
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:57 pm
by girish1428
Hi,
When I saw the latest ILR application form SET(O), I couldn't see the "more than 90 consecutive days stay out of UK" rule anywhere.
All I could see in the form was.... "C1. Please confirm that you have not been absent from the United Kingdom for more than 180 days in any 12 calendar months during the specified period of continuous leave:
I have not been absent for more than 180 days in any 12 calendar months during the specified period of continuous leave."
So is the 90 day rule no more !!
It would be great if that was the case
Cheers,
GIrish.
Re: ILR SET (O)- 90 days rule no more ?
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:06 pm
by ryan2020
strange new invention.
If they have remove 90 days thing from guidance notes as well then it means there is no more 90 day rule. but i don't think so..
members please comment
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:06 pm
by girish1428
Sorry...........
Its is still there....
I can see it here...
"Please confirm whether you have been outside of the UK for any single absence over 3 months or one or more absences which amount to more than 6 month"
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:06 pm
by ryan2020
girish1428 wrote:Sorry...........
Its is still there....
I can see it here...
"Please confirm whether you have been outside of the UK for any single absence over 3 months or one or more absences which amount to more than 6 month"
Can you comment pls
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:46 am
by uksettlement
Hi Guys,
I will qualify for ILR in April 2013 and want to get your opinion on one main question is it best to apply at a PEO or make a postal application. I am tempted towards postal but it will be good to get your opinions on this.
HSMP approval march 28 2008
HSMP approval 4th April 2008
Landed in uk in end of April 2008
1st extension 9th nov 2009 (same day PEO) visa granted from 9th nov 2009 to 4th April 2013
Based on this I can apply in mid-march 2013 if I go for postal.
Total absence: 264 days
dec 2008 to jan 2008 about 20 days
June to July 2009 about 35 days (business trip to India 2 weeks holiday and 3 weeks work)
Nov 2010 to jan 2011 approx 60 days (business trip to India)
Jan 2011 spent a week in uk
Jan 2011 to June approx 153 days (business trip to India)
July 2011 onwards there is no further break.
Personal reasons or paid leave: 20+14=34
Business trips: 20+62+153=225
All business trips were related to employment wherein 1st visit was to explore the potential of outsourcing, 2nd was to setup the operations and 3rd was to manage it for sometime. During all the trips I was paid in uk, have letter from employer and all my salary slips, bank statements and p45s. Also the, employer letter states that the trips were necessary for the employer as well as my employment. I didn't maintain the house here in the last two visits.
I left that job and took up a new job in jan 2012.
Now as per the guidance I will have problems as both the clauses of continuous residence are broken more than 180 days in 5 years and 90 days at stretch.
I know it's not straightforward application hence I was thinking of going for postal application.
If they refuse I will appeal and worst case go for one more extension if required.
I would want to know what the senior members of the forum feel?
Two questions:
How should I apply, Postal or PEO?
What do you think are the chances of it being successful at the first attempt?