ILR Granted - Admin Review Successful
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 1:16 pm
Hi All,
Firstly, I would like to thank everybody that helped me with their input in relation to my previous post. http://www.immigrationboards.com/indefi ... 11423.html
My timeline is as follows:
Application Date - 18th June Croydon PEO
Rejection Letter - 29th August
Admin Review - 6th September
Admin Review Extension - Received email on 4th Oct (deadline day) saying they need two more weeks
ILR granted - 14th October
I consulted a lawyer after my refusal and was advised to apply for AR myself because in his words "you know what you are talking about".
I have been following this forum for a while now and my understanding was that AR is just a formality with another refusal for the applicant which is the reason I was mentally prepared for a JR. However, I had a good stab at the AR pointing out obvious mistakes in Home Office's letter. The explanation of my Admin Review was as follows:
"
Dear Sir,
Further to your letter dated 29th August 2016, I wish to apply for the administrative review of your
decision. I believe that there is a case working error that has resulted in my application being refused.
Please note that I am NOT providing any new information or facts. This is merely an explanation to your
decision and was verbally provided to the caseworker at the time of the application.
Reason for Refusal
Your letter states that on 8th July 2013, I applied for leave to remain under Tier 1 (General) immigrant and
claimed 25 points for earnings of £45,990 from ABC Limited. Your letter further
states that on assessing the evidence it shows a discrepancy with HMRC records as I declared income of
£11,232 for that period. This has been deemed deceitful and dishonest by the caseworker and the
application has therefore been refused under general grounds of refusal.
No other objection or reasons for refusal has been identified by the caseworker.
Caseworking Error/Explanation
Having reviewed my application submitted on 8th July 2013, I am unable to locate the figure of £45,990
mentioned on your letter. The accounts submitted at the time stated turnover of the company as £48,586
and the net profit of £36,681. I can only assume that there is a typing mistake on the letter that has been
sent to me or the caseworker has been looking at the incorrect figure. Furthermore, I only claimed 20
points for profits of £36,681 not 25 as stated on your letter.
In any case, the £48,586 figure is for turnover of the company and under the HMRC rules is NOT my
personal income. I have not implied this to be my income either explicitly or verbally at any point in my
application.
Paragraph 92 of the Tier 1 (General) Policy Guidance states that “If you are self-employed and have
chosen to retain the profits within the business, your earnings are limited to the share of the business’s net
profits to which you are entitled. The appropriate proportion of the net profit of the business (that is, after
tax and outgoings) can therefore be counted as your gross salary. We will only consider profits made
during the appropriate 12-month earnings period for which you are claiming.” The application made on 8th
July 2013, clearly stated that the points were being claimed on the retained profits in the company of
£36,681 under the rule quoted above. This is by virtue of my 100% shareholding in ABC Limited. This can be confirmed by the Companies House records and confirmation letter provided by accountant with the application.
The application does not imply anywhere that £36,681 is my personal income. Chapter 3 of the Income
Tax Act 2007 clearly states that a shareholder needs to declare income on his personal tax return only
when the money is drawn out of the business as dividends or salary. Retained profits in the business are
NOT required to be declared on the personal tax return.
Conclusion
I think it is evident from the above that a caseworking error has occurred due to the caseworker’s lack of
understanding of immigration and income tax rules. Furthermore, the caseworker has quoted “earnings”
and points figure in their letter that do not match my application of 8th July 2013. I can only assume that
this was due to human error.
I am aware that it is common practice for the caseworkers to verify the “income” with HMRC to ensure that
the income being claimed is genuine. However, this wouldn’t apply in this instance as my profits have
been retained in the business and not taken out of the business as dividends. Furthermore, three
separate pieces of evidence (bank statements, letters from clients and accountant’s letter) were provided
with my application of 8th July 2013 and of 19th June 2016 to verify that the turnover/profits of the
company are genuine. This is one more than the two evidences required by UKBA as per the guidelines
of Tier 1 (General) visa. Therefore, I don’t think there can be any doubt about the fact that the turnover
and profits of the business are genuine and have been achieved by actual services provided by myself.
I look forward to hearing from you.
"
Although everything I have said in the letter above is true and genuine, I believe that the key is to point out all the errors from the refusal letter. The Admin Review is carried out by a senior caseworker and they have a right to refuse applications on the points that were not picked up by the original caseworker. However, I think some consideration must be placed on how the case will look if the application eventually ends up in court. By highlighting the basic errors, I have underlined the incompetency of the original caseworker.
I am aware that the forum is full of topics from applicants who post their original queries and no follow up of how they got on with it and what was the conclusion. So I am posting this topic just to update you and with a hope that it may be able to help somebody with their application.
Happy to answer any queries that you guys may have.
Good Luck!
Thanks
Firstly, I would like to thank everybody that helped me with their input in relation to my previous post. http://www.immigrationboards.com/indefi ... 11423.html
My timeline is as follows:
Application Date - 18th June Croydon PEO
Rejection Letter - 29th August
Admin Review - 6th September
Admin Review Extension - Received email on 4th Oct (deadline day) saying they need two more weeks
ILR granted - 14th October
I consulted a lawyer after my refusal and was advised to apply for AR myself because in his words "you know what you are talking about".
I have been following this forum for a while now and my understanding was that AR is just a formality with another refusal for the applicant which is the reason I was mentally prepared for a JR. However, I had a good stab at the AR pointing out obvious mistakes in Home Office's letter. The explanation of my Admin Review was as follows:
"
Dear Sir,
Further to your letter dated 29th August 2016, I wish to apply for the administrative review of your
decision. I believe that there is a case working error that has resulted in my application being refused.
Please note that I am NOT providing any new information or facts. This is merely an explanation to your
decision and was verbally provided to the caseworker at the time of the application.
Reason for Refusal
Your letter states that on 8th July 2013, I applied for leave to remain under Tier 1 (General) immigrant and
claimed 25 points for earnings of £45,990 from ABC Limited. Your letter further
states that on assessing the evidence it shows a discrepancy with HMRC records as I declared income of
£11,232 for that period. This has been deemed deceitful and dishonest by the caseworker and the
application has therefore been refused under general grounds of refusal.
No other objection or reasons for refusal has been identified by the caseworker.
Caseworking Error/Explanation
Having reviewed my application submitted on 8th July 2013, I am unable to locate the figure of £45,990
mentioned on your letter. The accounts submitted at the time stated turnover of the company as £48,586
and the net profit of £36,681. I can only assume that there is a typing mistake on the letter that has been
sent to me or the caseworker has been looking at the incorrect figure. Furthermore, I only claimed 20
points for profits of £36,681 not 25 as stated on your letter.
In any case, the £48,586 figure is for turnover of the company and under the HMRC rules is NOT my
personal income. I have not implied this to be my income either explicitly or verbally at any point in my
application.
Paragraph 92 of the Tier 1 (General) Policy Guidance states that “If you are self-employed and have
chosen to retain the profits within the business, your earnings are limited to the share of the business’s net
profits to which you are entitled. The appropriate proportion of the net profit of the business (that is, after
tax and outgoings) can therefore be counted as your gross salary. We will only consider profits made
during the appropriate 12-month earnings period for which you are claiming.” The application made on 8th
July 2013, clearly stated that the points were being claimed on the retained profits in the company of
£36,681 under the rule quoted above. This is by virtue of my 100% shareholding in ABC Limited. This can be confirmed by the Companies House records and confirmation letter provided by accountant with the application.
The application does not imply anywhere that £36,681 is my personal income. Chapter 3 of the Income
Tax Act 2007 clearly states that a shareholder needs to declare income on his personal tax return only
when the money is drawn out of the business as dividends or salary. Retained profits in the business are
NOT required to be declared on the personal tax return.
Conclusion
I think it is evident from the above that a caseworking error has occurred due to the caseworker’s lack of
understanding of immigration and income tax rules. Furthermore, the caseworker has quoted “earnings”
and points figure in their letter that do not match my application of 8th July 2013. I can only assume that
this was due to human error.
I am aware that it is common practice for the caseworkers to verify the “income” with HMRC to ensure that
the income being claimed is genuine. However, this wouldn’t apply in this instance as my profits have
been retained in the business and not taken out of the business as dividends. Furthermore, three
separate pieces of evidence (bank statements, letters from clients and accountant’s letter) were provided
with my application of 8th July 2013 and of 19th June 2016 to verify that the turnover/profits of the
company are genuine. This is one more than the two evidences required by UKBA as per the guidelines
of Tier 1 (General) visa. Therefore, I don’t think there can be any doubt about the fact that the turnover
and profits of the business are genuine and have been achieved by actual services provided by myself.
I look forward to hearing from you.
"
Although everything I have said in the letter above is true and genuine, I believe that the key is to point out all the errors from the refusal letter. The Admin Review is carried out by a senior caseworker and they have a right to refuse applications on the points that were not picked up by the original caseworker. However, I think some consideration must be placed on how the case will look if the application eventually ends up in court. By highlighting the basic errors, I have underlined the incompetency of the original caseworker.
I am aware that the forum is full of topics from applicants who post their original queries and no follow up of how they got on with it and what was the conclusion. So I am posting this topic just to update you and with a hope that it may be able to help somebody with their application.
Happy to answer any queries that you guys may have.
Good Luck!
Thanks