Immigrationboards.com

Hi,
I Applied for ILR last week via SUPER PRIORITY APPLICATION. I came here from a Non EU country as a spouse of a British Citizen, and finished 5 year route.

I received the letter today saying the ILR has been refused however they gave me LIMITED LEAVE TO REMIAN for 30 months.

Now my question is what will happen after 30 months?
Can I apply for ILR after 30 months?
Or am I in the 10 year route now?
And does the 10 year route mean from now + 10 years which is in total 15 years here,
Or is si from now + 5 years in total 10?!

Im very confused.

Thanks in advance

Why was ILR refused?

Which requirement did you not meet?

Thanks for your reply!
Because of the financial requirements unfortunately!

What did the letter say exactly about the limited leave granted, exact words? It would stated under which rule and conditions you have been give a visa.

Did HO ask you to pay IHS?

Why did you apply for ILR when you didn't meet the financial requirement?

Our case is a bit complex.

I came in the UK 6 years ago after getting married with a British citizen. I started to work, he was working, everything was fine, we had a baby, I had to stay at home a bit more and not work, then my husband got ill.
Problems with his spine and a nerve which made walking difficult for him. He the. Had the operation and after being sick for a long time and due to the medical reasons he was considered he isn’t fit to work there (leisure) anymore, so he started to get benefits. I do work part time and earn £14000 a year. We knew it’s not enough but were hopping they will consider all the situation (now I feel embarrassed and silly for thinking that way) anyway, the letter says:

“ Thank you for your application for indefinite leave to remian. Your application has not been considered by the Secretary of State personally, but by an official acting on their behalf.
We have considered your application and you do not qualify for indefinite leave to remain. The reasons for this are set out in Annex A to this letter.
However, we are satisfied that you would fall to be granted limited leave to remain for 30 months on the basis of R-LTRP.1.1 (a), (b) and (d) of Appendix FM, were you to make a valid application for such as leave.
In these circumstances, in accordance with the consent you gave on the application form, we are now treating your application as an application for limited leave to remain. “
Plus they asked me to pay the Health Charge , of course.

So what do you think?

Thanks again

CR001 wrote: ↑

Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:10 pm

What did the letter say exactly about the limited leave granted, exact words? It would stated under which rule and conditions you have been give a visa.

Did HO ask you to pay IHS?

Why did you apply for ILR when you didn't meet the financial requirement?

I’m waiting for your reply patiently!