Page 1 of 1
320.00£ for JR that never took place
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 4:00 pm
by Zimsparta
After apllying for a judicial review which was rejected,
I have to pay 320£ to the Homeoffice now. As I had to pay 140£ for the review application I don't really understand why I would have to pay all that money for nothing. Is that really my duty to pay?
Re: 320.00£ for JR that never took place
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 4:05 pm
by Obie
In civil proceeding, you pay for the other parties Acknowledgement of Service if you lose your claim.
Re: 320.00£ for JR that never took place
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 8:13 pm
by secret.simon
Generally, in English (non-criminal) law, the loser pays the fees for both his own side and that of the winner.
Re: 320.00£ for JR that never took place
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 9:32 pm
by Zimsparta
secret.simon wrote:Generally, in English (non-criminal) law, the loser pays the fees for both his own side and that of the winner.
this fee is very unproportionate. But I guess that's how the HO works. They are unreasonable in all ways.
Re: 320.00£ for JR that never took place
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 9:43 pm
by CR001
Zimsparta wrote:secret.simon wrote:Generally, in English (non-criminal) law, the loser pays the fees for both his own side and that of the winner.
this fee is very unproportionate. But I guess that's how the HO works. They are unreasonable in all ways.
The fee is not set by HO, it is set by the Courts/Judiciary.