Post
by Obie » Sat Sep 17, 2016 6:19 pm
Had the application been refused with a right of appeal, your right to employment would have continued.
I am concerned about the certification, given the fact that your appeal was previously, even though it is unclear why the appeal was allowed notwithstanding the fact that the financial requirement is not met.
It may be the case, that the Judge concluded then that their was in insurmountable obstacle to you returning with your wife to your home country, and Home Office takes the view now, that no insurmountable obstacle exist at this time.
I believe the certificate may be too harsh, if not unlawful.
Thing never use to be this bad.
I witnessed a case where a person had won his deportation appeal, and then the SSHD sought to deport him again after the 2014 act came into effect, following the renewal of his discretionary leave, even though he had committed no subsequent offense.
The Judge found it most troubling, like i did. The presenting officer states that this is their new policy. That they are allowed to review things again.
I don't believe it is review, it is more like circumventing the decision of a tribunal.
These days the decision of tribunal counts for nothing with the Secretary of State.
Smooth seas do not make skilful sailors