- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Possibly, but unwarranted assertions from some other people too.gollywood wrote:OTT reaction from the OP I might add.
Yeah my view is otherwise. Just because you don't like what I have to say, you don't go crying to mommie about it. And certainly the op's reaction is more indefensible than my statements.stmellon wrote:SYH, I'm appalled by your response to the OP and have reported it to the Admin.
I think it's far more likely that this is a huge shock to the system, and he doesn't want to compound his wife's distress by breaking down over the phone when there is nothing that she can do in the immediate term.
Why make a statement like this..... It serves no purpose than to upset and compound peoples' misery.SYH wrote:guess he married you for a visa and doesn't need to discuss it with you right now. probably looking into his alternate options.
No it is helping the OP to wise up to a possible scam and further heartache and disappointment. Too many people come on here with this story and that is probably why the HO rejected the visa request. They dont' see it as genuine marriage either.frances2 wrote:Why make a statement like this..... It serves no purpose than to upset and compound peoples' misery.SYH wrote:guess he married you for a visa and doesn't need to discuss it with you right now. probably looking into his alternate options.
Nobody asked you for your opinion on the relationship, furthermore what makes you think you're in a position to comment.
Totally unnessacary and uncalled for. I for one think the admin should look seriously at what and how you are contributing to the board.
You seem plain nasty.
That is as may be. But don't forget, this isn't a forum for personal or relationship problems. It's a forum for immigration problems. The immigration problem that the OP alludes to might be related in some way to what you are surmising, but it might not be. Since we don't know what the issues are that have led to the rejection of the visa application, I would say that it behoves people who respond to the OP to ask what these issues are or to suggest what might happen next, not to make personal remarks on the basis of very little evidence, one way or the other, about the personal issues involved. Common decency and an only average understanding of human emotions ought also to suggest, I should have thought, that the OP is at present very upset about what has happened. If you don't want to do deal first with the immigration issues, moving on to matters relating to the marriage only if they prove to be relevant, I fail to see why you seem to think that you need to post at all.SYH wrote:Yeah my view is otherwise. Just because you don't like what I have to say, you don't go crying to mommie about it. And certainly the op's reaction is more indefensible than my statements.
Together for 8 weeks is not much a solid marriage make so I have my doubts as to his genuineness. Clearly the OP is too much of a romantic to be practical.
The difference, surely, lies in the way it was put. A simple question about the background to the rejection would have been a much more sensible approach. As I noted above, if someone isn't prepared to do it humanely and politely, instead of making vain and haughty assumptions, why bother to post at all?Wanderer wrote:So we've only to tell people what they want to hear?
I personally wouldn't have gone as far as SYH in actually saying it but I was thinking it, as I'm sure many other were. So what's the real difference?
Let's just move on from this...Sarah D wrote:We got married last July in India, he is going mad over there, we have been apart for so long and were so thorough in our application, I dont know why I am posting this, I cannot even ask for advice yet as I dont know the reason cos he just text me to tell me then turned his phone off. I dont understand why life has to be this hard
Everything is a speculation, so that is a ridiculous reason for not saying what I was thinking. she said she didn't know why he was rejected because the hubby didn't have the courtesy of telling his wife what the problem was. Sounds like an electronic dear john letter and a really unsophisticated one at that. And don't tell me about it is an immigration issue when you get whiny soppy people being abused by their spouses who commit bigamy and leave their children as soon as they get their ILR. As a result, the immigration issue can not be dealt in a vacuum which is why the HO tries to interview and obtain as many details as possible. And it speaks volumes that the HO has rejected the application. It isn't a genuine marriage in their eyes and as soon as she has the guts to write about the rejection, provided hubby tells her the truth, you will see that the HO doesn't decide visa in a vacuum either. Stop being some moral authority when it is just because you feel sorry for her. Feel sorry for her but don't condone her delusion of the matter either.Christophe wrote: That is as may be. But don't forget, this isn't a forum for personal or relationship problems. It's a forum for immigration problems. The immigration problem that the OP alludes to might be related in some way to what you are surmising, but it might not be. Since we don't know what the issues are that have led to the rejection of the visa application, I would say that it behoves people who respond to the OP to ask what these issues are or to suggest what might happen next, not to make personal remarks on the basis of very little evidence, one way or the other, about the personal issues involved. Common decency and an only average understanding of human emotions ought also to suggest, I should have thought, that the OP is at present very upset about what has happened. If you don't want to do deal first with the immigration issues, moving on to matters relating to the marriage only if they prove to be relevant, I fail to see why you seem to think that you need to post at all.
I don't "condone her delusion" of the matter, because I know nothing about the matter. I haven't the faintest idea if she's deluded about it or not - not the faintest; and neither have you.SYH wrote:Stop being some moral authority when it is just because you feel sorry for her. Feel sorry for her but don't condone her delusion of the matter either.
The purpose was she wanted a reason for the refusal. I gave it to her.Christophe wrote:
However, this discussion is not the purpose of the OP's thread, so let's leave it there. We can agree to differ, I'm sure.
Listen Love, I've been here several years with many posts, helped for more than I've hindered if you'd bothered to read, ok I get pissed off with people asking the same old without bothering to search, criminals begging to stay etc. but on the whole I am a good boy.Twin wrote:I am probably the happiest that S.H.I.T (sorry, I meant SYH) has been banned. He was a very nasty member indeed.
Now it's Wanderer to follow, I hope.
SaraD, i'm so sorry to read about your refusal but from the reasons you've given, I think that decision would easily be overturned on appeal. Chin up and don't let faceless people on the internet get to you. SYH was a notorious member and believe it or not, he only not too long obtained his ILR but thinks he's far better than other immigrants.
Justice has been served on SYH! Now hurry with Wanderer's!