There is no requirement (in the immigration law) for dependents of HSMP JR protected migrants to have spent 2 years in the UK as dependents before becoming eligible for ILR.
The problem with UKBA clerks is that all they look at is the "Tier 1 migrant" or "Tier 1 partner / dependent" on the visa without getting into the background of the case and come up with the (dictatorial) conclusion that the individual is a Tier 1 migrant (and not HSMP migrant) and the "2 year residency" condition springs up in their heads.
Unless one is aware of the immigration rules applicable to HSMP migrants protected by HSMP JR (and their dependents), it is easy to be taken advantage of or being easily misguided ..... like in your case. Dependent(s) of HSMP migrants protected by HSMP JR are covered under immigration rules
194 - 196F unlike dependents of Tier 1 migrants who are covered under immigration rules
319A - 319K. Requirements for ILR for dependents of HSMP migrants (196D) do not include any condition that the dependent must have lived in UK for 2 years as a dependent to become eligible for ILR. On the other had, ILR requirements for Tier 1 dependents clearly specify such a condition (319E(d)).
Moreover, the
HSMP Forum Ltd judicial review (settlement) policy document clearly states that (para 29) "The immigration status of dependants of migrants in the categories covered by this policy will follow that of the principal applicant".
Looks like we faced the same clerk (in fact there were two of them with the same views on the day of my appointment) but I guess I had the good fortune of getting a caseworker who knew which immigration rules to apply in our case and straight-away rejected the clerk's notes on the application) and struck them off.
As I mentioned in my
earlier post on the issue, in my case the dependent had entered UK (on a dependent visa) only 3 days before the ILR appointment. Prior to travelling to home country to apply for dependent EC, both I and my partner had our own HSMP visas - in our own right!
regards