Post
by rachel29 » Thu Jul 25, 2013 10:59 am
Does this seem ok for this purpose allready wrote in april no reply back.
Dear Sir/Madam
URGENT FUNERAL TO ATTEND
I am ******** D.O.B ******** HO No:*******.
I recently applied for a FAMILY PERMIT under EU directive to enter the UK but was refused stating:
Regulation 19(1A) states "A person is not entitled to be admitted to the United Kingdom by virtue of regulation 11 if that person is subject to a deportation or exclusion order".
T he EXCLUSION DECISION was made due to me returning home under the FRS scheme after conviction in the UK. This conviction is now SPENT and I have no unspent convictions in the UK or any other country.
I also believe that my circumstances have changed as I am now married to my British wife and have two EEA children and am resident in the EU.
I also believe that the following guidelines apply in my case:
Before 2010, exclusion decisions were routinely made in cases where a returnee did not meet the criteria for deportation but left the UK under the terms of the FRS. Exclusion is no longer applied in these cases.
Paragraph 320(7)(B)(iv) of the Immigration Rules provides for a mandatory refusal of entry clearance for a minimum of two years for persons who left the UK under the terms of a government sponsored scheme, such as FRS:
• within six months of the date when they were given notice of the removal decision, or
• no more than six months after the date when the person no longer had a pending appeal, whichever is the later.
Under paragraph 320(7)(C) these exclusion periods do not apply if entry is being sought:
• as a spouse, civil or other partner
• as a parent, grandparent or other dependent relative for access to a child.
As with deportation orders made under the 1971 Act there are cases where the subject of a non-EEA exclusion decision now benefits under the EEA regulations.
Consideration must be given to whether an exclusion order must be made under the EEA regulations. This is a higher test than for non-EEA cases and cannot be based solely on the person’s previous criminality. It must demonstrate the person’s exclusion on public policy is justified on the grounds they represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat as set out in regulation 21(5) (c) of the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006.
Regulation 21 (5) of the 2006 Regulations sets out the threshold that needs to be met before an EEA national, or member of their family, can be excluded:
The decision must be proportionate.
The decision must be based solely on the personal conduct of the person concerned.
The personal conduct of the individual must represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting a fundamental interest of society. Whatever the person has done in the past, there needs to be evidence of a present threat.
Matters isolated from the particulars of the case or a person’s previous criminal convictions do not in themselves justify the decision.
I there for ask for the Exclusion decision to be considered for revocation immediately.
Regards