- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Vinny, One more question.vinny wrote:In March 2013, she failed 196A(v), but her appeal succeeded on human rights grounds (5.2). Unfortunately, the changes came too late.
However, under the current rules, she may apply for SET(O) now, if she satisfies 196D, 196E.
vinny wrote:However, under the current rules, she may apply for SET(O) now, if she satisfies 196D, 196E.
Dear Vinny,vinny wrote:If you were a non-PBS work permit holder immediately before being granted ILR, then 196E, 196D should be satisfiable.
Do check the rules. if she does satisfy 196E, then they may grant ILR under the rules. There would be no reasons for refusal under 196F.
Child may also apply for ILR with her under 199A.
See similar case.
It doesn't matter!Alishah wrote:Unfortunately she was given partner dependant visa as per R-LTRP 1.1 a, b and d, under immigration rules D-LTRP 1.2.
Hi Vinny,vinny wrote:British kids do not need to do anything more.
It doesn't matter!Alishah wrote:Unfortunately she was given partner dependant visa as per R-LTRP 1.1 a, b and d, under immigration rules D-LTRP 1.2.
If there are no unspent convictions, etc, then there is no need to wait.
KOLL required.
vinny wrote:Good luck!
Print out the Immigration rules and take the printout with you. You may have to refer 196E, etc., to the caseworker.
I think this is a case where multiple rules are applicable. I think that the application is possible under Part 5. The OP's wife is not relying on A280 under Part 8, but on 196E under Part 5. So, A280B is not violated.A280B wrote:An applicant aged 18 or over may not rely on paragraph A280 where, since their last grant of limited leave to enter or remain under Part 8, they have been granted or refused leave under Appendix FM, Appendix Armed Forces or paragraph 276BE to CE of these rules, or been granted limited leave to enter or remain in a category outside their original route to settlement.
is also explicit.196D wrote:(iv) was not last granted:
(1) entry clearance or leave as a visitor, short-term student or short-term student (child),
(2) temporary admission, or
(3) temporary release; and
Syed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 (07 September 2011) wrote:It is thus in the nature of the Immigration Rules that they include no over-arching implicit purposes. Their only purpose is to articulate the Secretary of State's specific policies with regard to immigration control from time to time, as to which there are no presumptions, liberal or restrictive. The whole of their meaning is, so to speak, worn on their sleeve...