- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
femooh wrote:Does the fact that we have continuously lived together all these years (9 years) amount to being ‘married’ and considered husband and wife?
What was your wife's immigration status in 2001 when your son was born? We you married to her at the time or subsequently? What is her current immigration status?femooh wrote:My son, born in 2001, of an unsettled mother with no immigration status,
What is her current migration status in the UK? What was her status when she entered the UK from Ireland in 2005? Has she got no leave to remain in the UK at the moment?femooh wrote:My wife came on a visitor visa and apparently became an over-stayer since she didn't return before the expiration of her visa. And she has since remained here in Europe.
In which country were you "traditionally married"? Were you registered as married in that country? Does your home country recognise "traditional marriage"?femooh wrote:Yes, we were traditionally married, but does that count here.
Both the children born in the UK can register for citizenship under Section 1(3) of the British Nationality Act 1981, based on your ILR. Ignore the part above about the children getting ILR as that was based on the assumption that they were born abroad.femooh wrote:there are presently two children, both born in the UK
Try not to confuse the OP .secret.simon wrote:@vinny,
Would the elder child not register under Section 1(3), if he is named as the father on the UK birth certificate?
Vinny I stand to be corrected, but is it not the case that UKF is applicable only to those child who would have automatically acquired citizenship under section 1 (1) or 2 (1) had their father been married to their mother at the time of their birth.vinny wrote:I believe that the elder child should use form UKF.
Chapter 7A: registration of persons born before 1 July 2006 whose parents were not married (nationality instructions) wrote:3. Application Forms
An application for a child under the age of 18 (under section 4F) should be made on the minors’ application form MN1.
An application under sections 4G-I should be made on form UKF.
Funny how these policy are designed. It follows that a child who applies under Section 1(4) could very well face refusal if he or she has resided in the UK without leave, as he/she is likely to make such application a day after the 10th Birthday.vinny wrote:Yes. According to the casworkers' instructions linked to above, we believe that the form MN1 is suitable for the elder child as well.
Breaks in residency is irrelevant under Section 4F(1)(b)(i) when child is under 10. It's relevant, if registering under Section 1(4).
However, with the new Good Character requirements for people over 10 years old, if he had overstayed, then he may be refused.
If he wasn't granted leave, then see also Chapter 2: Entry without leave.Immigration Rules part 1: leave to enter or stay in the UK wrote:Common Travel Area
15. The United Kingdom, the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man and the Republic of Ireland collectively form a common travel area. A person who has been examined for the purpose of immigration control at the point at which he entered the area does not normally require leave to enter any other part of it. However certain persons subject to the Immigration (Control of Entry through the Republic of Ireland) Order 1972 (as amended) who enter the United Kingdom through the Republic of Ireland do require leave to enter. This includes:
(i) those who merely passed through the Republic of Ireland;
(ii) persons requiring visas;
(iii) persons who entered the Republic of Ireland unlawfully;
(iv) persons who are subject to directions given by the Secretary of State for their
exclusion from the United Kingdom on the ground that their exclusion is conducive to the public good;
femooh wrote:It bothers me to think that a child that was taken out and back to the UK while still a 5/6-year old could be penalised. He was not responsible for that action and I also feel that "provision" would be nugatory if a child is penalised for actions for which they were not responsible.
But who am I to judge.
Please, do we have immigration lawyer(s) within this forum that can takes this up for my family.
I thank you all for your wonderful contributions and appreciate the time you sacrificed but I still your support/ advice for this final huddle. Bless you.