- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Thanks for sharing your friends experience, do you know whether that was recent? They way I understand it, if you have a visa, you don't require an ESTA. But as each is granted on an individual's passport, I was looking to get clarity on what the appropriate thing to do would be in my circumstances where I have two valid passports. In the old topic discussion I've posted above, I did see someone in a similar situation who had a valid visa on their non-VWP passport and also had a ESTA on their VWP - which they used for travel. But given that, that topic is really old now, wanted to see if anyone else had recent experience of the same.fielddrive wrote:Isn't ESTA rendered useless if you are in possession of a visa? So getting an ESTA while you have a visa may not be accepted, I don't know. A friend of mine in a similar situation to yours, travelled on his native passport but kept his naturalised British passport for return to the UK.
I'll probably need to try and do some reading around this to see if I can find out more. I'm sure there are many multiple citizenship holders out there. I guess one factor that may matter would probably be how much of a US immigration/visa history you have on your original passport. In my case I've had multiple US visas in the past, both to visit and long term work, so I do have a US immigration history under my native nationality passport. Never had any issues, but it makes completing new visa application forms somewhat tedious, as I need to complete historic details from past visas.Also, the US immigration law lays emphasis on country of chargeability which is your country of birth as opposed to your country of nationality.
cs95tdg wrote:Thanks for sharing your friends experience, do you know whether that was recent?
A very valid point. From memory the only time I had a longer than usual conversation with a US border official on the purpose of my visit was the very first time I visited the US, I felt that was because I mentioned it was my first visit to the US when they asked. All subsequent travel/entry was very quick - with the standard questions to ask where I've travelled from & how long I'll be staying - and sometimes where I work. The wait/delay was always in airport immigration queues.fielddrive wrote:When I first started going to the US as an adult a few years ago I used to get detained quite a lot but now I get no grief by CBP due to the travel history I have built up over the years. In my case, I'd prefer to go on my native passport as it seems to have built a rapport with them and avoid having to go through building a new relationship on a new passport.
As you are within your rights to hold dual nationality (the US allows it too so they should be accustomed to it), I don't see why that arrangement wouldn't work. The only issue is with American citizens as US govt restricts them to travel on their American passports.cs95tdg wrote:What I'm wondering is whether I'd have to present both native and British passports when leaving the US. I'd assume they would need my native one to record my departure (electronic i94) and then the British one to verify that I have the right to enter the UK. Would that work?
Agree with that, as you would only have been British once you had taken oath. From the US end they probably wouldn't have known the difference either way, as the BRP biometrics are only checked when you enter the UK.fielddrive wrote:All I can say is that the last time I flew from ORD to LHR was a few days after my citizenship approval but before oath. I presented my passport and BRP as usual and did not experience anything unusual.
Thanks. Yes, that's what I've read too. So it looks like I should be good to travel as I initially thought.As you are within your rights to hold dual nationality (the US allows it too so they should be accustomed to it), I don't see why that arrangement wouldn't work. The only issue is with American citizens as US govt restricts them to travel on their American passports.
I was worried about the same thing i94 records so i contacted CPB via email and their response wasI'd assume they would need my native one to record my departure (electronic i94) and then the British one to verify that I have the right to enter the UK. Would that work?