- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Agreed CR001. Apologies.CR001 wrote:Kindly refrain from posting comments which could inflame this topic discussion and cause it to go off what the OP intended.
How do you know that that is not true already? It is not improbable that they almost certainly already have an HMRC person advising the caseworkers on doubtful cases.shanuk wrote:What I feel is that if HO is interested to check HMRC records then it should be mandatory to have an HMRC staff in their office with Case Workers.
I think any Tax deception can come under money laundering investigation. Money Laundering is an area for all kind of criminal activities including National security!f317633 wrote:They are branding us as "terrorist". This should be another reason to file a defamation case against HO. How can amending tax be a threat to national security?
This does not make sense. So you mean to say that 100s of 1000s of people who correct their tax records by way of amendments are all dishonest and are threat to national security? How can tax be linked to money laundering. I myself has personally worked in AML area for many years in this country. Never came across anything like this that tax evasion or what u say deception is linked to money laundering. This is bizarre. I can't understandsunny_sunny wrote:I think any Tax deception can come under money laundering investigation. Money Laundering is an area for all kind of criminal activities including National security!f317633 wrote:They are branding us as "terrorist". This should be another reason to file a defamation case against HO. How can amending tax be a threat to national security?
i am confident on this that they haven't got a person from hmrc who is advising this because hmrc doesn't see this out of their rule practice otherwise those who has done their amendments would have been prosecuted by HMRC, secondly HO using data from 2015 which they clearly mentioning in their refusals so this confirms that they haven't got any one from hmrc to get advise on thissecret.simon wrote:How do you know that that is not true already? It is not improbable that they almost certainly already have an HMRC person advising the caseworkers on doubtful cases.shanuk wrote:What I feel is that if HO is interested to check HMRC records then it should be mandatory to have an HMRC staff in their office with Case Workers.
What would the purpose of these barristers and chartered accountants be? Would it be to advise individual applicants on their specific cases? Or would it be to launch an action on the Home Office, like the HSMP applicants did, and if so, what would the specific ground of action be?
There is no 'UKBA'. The UKBA was disbanded on the 31st March 2013 and superseded by the UKVI (United Kingdom Visas & Immigration).shanky wrote:Count me in. Lets shows UKBA people power.