- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
The UK system of administration has evolved over 300 years or more into a monstrous and Kafkaesque but still dispassionate and impersonal machine.Kevinkens wrote:Please help... Bare with me this is the first time I am posting.
...
He was refused on the fact that he had overstayed in the uk for 6 years and he didnt have the A1 english test results when application was made. However this was on route and he passed with high marks.
...
I really dont know what else to do... I have spent so much money on solicitors and provided everything I can possibly provide, I understand they want to punish him for overstaying but its really not fair when he meets all the requirements requested.
...
You appear to have been unfortunate and ill-advised, an innocent abroad, rather than calculating and nefarious.Kevinkens wrote:Thank you for you reply but our solicitor didnt mention that we needed to provide this until the last min and as soon as we found out we booked the exam straight away in Mauritius and mentioned this in our application. We were advised by the solicitors even if we reapplied with the certificate we would still be rejected because of him over staying. Not having that certificate was just an excuse to refuse his entry clearance.
We have changed solicitor since we have made the appeal. My Husband's N.I number was sent along with the application as requested by our previous solicitor. He was allowed part time work when he was still legit in the country but our solicitor did not state that in our application and which we assume now to have lead the clearance officer to believe that he had frustrated immigration rules by working illegally using his N.I.Casa wrote:Your husband would only be refused a spouse visa if he had 'frustrated the Immigration rules'. For example working or entering with false documents, non-payment of NHS charges, not for just an overstay.
I think you solicitor may be attempting to look for an excuse to cover his error.
This forum does not allow recommendations of solicitors (seen as a form of advertising).Kevinkens wrote:Hi all, i would be grateful if someone can help me with a good solicitor around the south west london area. Our previous legal representative has told us that he has ceased acting on our case.
No recommendations.Kevinkens wrote:Hi all, i would be grateful if someone can help me with a good solicitor around the south west london area. Our previous legal representative has told us that he has ceased acting on our case.
Few weeks ago i had asked our previous solicitor to whether my husband could come to the UK on a 4 weeks visit visa so he could attend to my late father memorial ceremony and he said he could after he makes an application to the UKVI. couple of weeks later we received the decision from the UKVI and we were told because of my husband overstaying he was banned for entry for a period of 12 months because he had left the UK voluntarily. As of which if a new application for a spouse visa was to be submitted, will this ban still be in place or would it be waived off if we would meet all requirement this second time except the fact that he overstayed.John Green wrote:Just to agree with this statement as a general proposition, "It would have been quicker to reapply than wait for an appeal. Appeals can take very long."
I am still waiting to hear about the verdict on my wife's application under a spouse visa regime. However, the feedback that I get is that unless there is something clearly wrong with the way the decision was made, it is (as said) better to start a new visa application form. For example, if the ECO overlooked an important document that was included, or also gave (as the reason for the refusal) the non-submission of a document that the applicant could not reasonably have expected them to supply.
Issues of discretion, as to whether an ECO has treated the applicant fairly and justly, I would imagine are part of his job. So unlikely to be overturned on appeal unless there is again something clearly wrong.
As a practical matter, appeals can take up to a year and there is no guarantee of success. Whereas submitting a new application takes, at most, 3 months. And since the ECO gave he reason for the refusal, the applicant can simply meet the requirement he stated the second time around.
The only real downside is the cost of a new visa application set again, I believe, the cost of an appeal at about £200. Generally, however, doing a new application is recommended over appealing, so far as I've been told.