Post
by yassine2015 » Thu Oct 27, 2016 12:42 pm
Hello,
My husbands EEA2 application was refused saying my husband was an illegal entrant living illegally in the UK and for COL when we lived in France for 7 months.
We appealed and had our hearing.
At the hearing the Home office failed to send a representative, so therefore myself and my husband were not cross examined. Our barrister, began by telling the judge that my husband was not an illegal entrant as he arrived with his Article 10 residence card and therefore not illegal in the UK the judge seemed ok with that. then he went on to say he will take normal format proceedures.
My husband left the room and then our barrister asked me to confirm my name, my witness statement was mine and i agree to the content and asked me to sign the back page. Then our barrister ask the judge is he had any questions, he said no questions. so my husband came back in and did exactly the same and then further said no questions. then asked our barrister for her submission speech.
In all, there hearing took half an our.
My question is, how long has it been taking to receive a judges decision?
Can the judge also refuse on something he thinks is not right? Or does he only have to go on what the Home Office has refused us on??
Also, our barrister mentioned, the Akrich case law incase he was to say we circumvented the law, she mentioned o and b vs netherlands case law regarding our center of life.
has anyone else had a judge that has not asked any questions and got the EEA2 in the end?
Our judge showed no indication at all as to whether it will be allowed or not.
Thank you!