- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
I sent a certified copy which was declined saying they can only accept originals. As for why I didn't apply sooner, I didn't know beforehand of this ridiculous requirement.CR001 wrote:Why didn't you apply for the child's passport sooner, before having to send the BRP back after your ceremony??
Did you keep a copy of the BRP or a certified copy?
You might need to apply for a SAR?
This is irrelevent. The child was born a citizen according the laws of this nation. The child is entitled to a passport because of that. Even if there never existed such a thing as a BRP, this would be true.CR001 wrote:Why didn't you apply for the child's passport sooner, before having to send the BRP back after your ceremony??
And to show that they need proof. Just being born in the UK, does not give citizenship anymore.ouflak1 wrote:This is irrelevent. The child was born a citizen according the laws of this nation. The child is entitled to a passport because of that. Even if there never existed such a thing as a BRP, this would be true.CR001 wrote:Why didn't you apply for the child's passport sooner, before having to send the BRP back after your ceremony??
I disagree. That's ridiculous to expect that a child who was born a citizen can't get a passport because of a five-day-window-versus-a-£1000-fine document.Petaltop wrote:Therefore what CR001 said, is correct. It would have been so much easier to have done this months ago when they had their BRPs as proof.ouflak1 wrote:This is irrelevent. The child was born a citizen according the laws of this nation. The child is entitled to a passport because of that. Even if there never existed such a thing as a BRP, this would be true.CR001 wrote:Why didn't you apply for the child's passport sooner, before having to send the BRP back after your ceremony??
Not true.Petaltop wrote:Just being born in the UK does not give citizenship anymore.
The child was born a citizen, even by the more restrictive laws of today, and should be able to acquire a passport just like every other native born citizen can.British Nationality Act of 1981 wrote: 1. (1) A person born in the United Kingdom after commencement shall be a British citizen if at the time of the birth (or adoption) his father or mother is
- a British citizne; or
- settled in the United Kingdom.
Not entirely sure what you are getting at here, you seem to be backing up the point you are disagreeing withouflak1 wrote:Not true.Petaltop wrote:Just being born in the UK does not give citizenship anymore.
British Nationality Act of 1981 wrote: 1. (1) A person born in the United Kingdom after commencement shall be a British citizen if at the time of the birth (or adoption) his father or mother is
- a British citizne; or
- settled in the United Kingdom.
Thanks. This is exactly the predicament I find myself in. If I'd known that the passport office would specifically ask for the BRP earlier when my child was born, I'd have applied for her passport earlier.ohara wrote:Not entirely sure what you are getting at here, you seem to be backing up the point you are disagreeing withouflak1 wrote:Not true.Petaltop wrote:Just being born in the UK does not give citizenship anymore.
British Nationality Act of 1981 wrote: 1. (1) A person born in the United Kingdom after commencement shall be a British citizen if at the time of the birth (or adoption) his father or mother is
- a British citizne; or
- settled in the United Kingdom.
The UK does not have unconditional jus soli any more. A child born in the UK will not automatically be a British citizen if at least one of the parents is not a British citizen or settled in the UK at the time of the birth. If one parent does then become settled, the child automatically gains an entitlement to be registered. They don't automatically become a British citizen.
The problem in this situation is when a children is born in the UK to parent(s) who are not British but ARE settled in the UK, they are automatically a British citizen at birth. But when applying for a passport for that child, the only reasonable way the parent can prove they were settled at the time of birth is by sending their ILR BRP. If the parent naturalises as British, they are required to destroy and return the BRP immediately. This is obviously a problem if they have not applied for a passport for the child before doing so, as they've been forced to destroy the only evidence they had that they were settled at the time of the child's birth.
Thank you so much for your help. This is I guess the best step in this condition. Now going to fill in the form but it doesn't mention fee anywhere. Can't seem to find it out on the website either. Can you please help with this too.JAJ wrote:You're unlikely to get an answer from those who asked the question originally- that person has not been on the forum since November 2016.
The solution is likely to apply for a Nationality Status Certificate. The Home Office can verify your settled status more efficiently than the Passport Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... us-form-ns
JAJ wrote:Fee for a Nationality Status Letter is GBP234- and if you ask for your documents back from the Passport Office they will probably cancel the passport application and keep the fee. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... l_2017.pdf
A better approach- if the Passport Office refuse to accept a copy of the BRP- might be to contact your Member of Parliament and ask him or her to request from the Home Office Minister a reason why they are demanding an original of a document that someone is obliged to send back to the Home Office. (unreasonable request for documentation). The Passport Office is an agency of the Home Office and should be able to contact the Home Office to verify that the copy is true.