Poteito potato...same thoughts..UKBA, UKVI, poteito, potato
whatever
same evil!
there has been restructuring and renaming exercises but essentially it is the same evil body in the end
And your calculations were quite close..
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Poteito potato...same thoughts..UKBA, UKVI, poteito, potato
whatever
same evil!
Ceremony fee has always been a separate listed amount. So still an increase and not a decrease. £1236 includes the ceremony fee.WRS wrote:Handy Table below.
On a side note Nationality Fee has been reduced from £1236 to £1202, but £80 ceremony fee has now been included in the application fee making it £1282.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... pr2017.pdf
I know it sounds like the mods are making a fuss about nothing, but it helps if people are precise when posting on public forums.paradoxical wrote:Poteito potato...same thoughts..
I generally advice members not to follow advice on the internet posted under UKBA, as this is likely to be well out-of-date.secret.simon wrote:I know it sounds like the mods are making a fuss about nothing, but it helps if people are precise when posting on public forums.paradoxical wrote:Poteito potato...same thoughts..
For instance, on these forums, people occasionally call ILR "PR", not realising that both of them are under different rules and have slightly different effects. Similarly, "applying for a British passport" is not the same as applying for naturalisation.
Calling concepts and bodies by their correct name aids in allowing others to provide the correct advice.
Well-reasoned.Casa wrote:I generally advice members not to follow advice on the internet posted under UKBA, as this is likely to be well out-of-date.
We *know* that the ILR fees will be going up to £3240 by April 2019. We *know* the direction of travel. We can guess the rate of increase per year.Business2business wrote:i am not opposed that uKVI will increase fee but £422 is killing.
I think it would be best for us to be realistic and plan accordingly.chenzz wrote: I think it will be £2250.00 this year, based on the calculation as
2016-17 1875
2017-18 1875*1.2=2250
2018-19 2250*1.2=2700
2019-20 2700*1.2=3240
secret.simon wrote:Calling concepts and bodies by their correct name aids in allowing others to provide the correct advice.
Thanks for pointing this out, very valid pointCasa wrote:I generally advice members not to follow advice on the internet posted under UKBA, as this is likely to be well out-of-date
secret.simon wrote:Another way of looking at it is that ILR fees have more than doubled in three years, from £1093 on 6th April 2014 to £2297 on 6th April 2017, an increase of about 110%.
The fee increase is brutal! In this world, many people/systems/organisations would act in a manner which can best be described as exploitation. A simple model to explain that would be: You have a subject who is desperate for a service/product and doesn't have alternative viable options, an actor who can provide the required service/product and also understands the desperation of the subject. The actor therefore has the luxury to either exploit this situation and charge exorbitant fees or not exploit and stay within reason (where within reason would be in line to making reasonable profits,not 5 or 6 times the cost! ). This model can explain lots of behaviours around the world and I will leave that to the reader's imagination to fit this model to various situations.Business2business wrote:here we come, uk now want to use immigration is tool to generate funds for their respected department.
i am not opposed that uKVI will increase fee but £422 is killing.
This would explain a lot. In a normal situation, one would keep the price of a product/service fixed or reasonable and increase the number of sales in order to boost income. In an exploitative model such as this one, they want to reduce the number of sales (number of ILRs granted), but still want to make as much profit as possible hence the exponential growth of the ILR fee..Ali272 wrote:ILR grants are down more than 50% since 2012. So they need to double the fees, just to make the same amount.
And the source of your statement above???Ali272 wrote:ILR grants are down more than 50% since 2012. So they need to double the fees, just to make the same amount.
HO know there is 'demand' for their service/visas and as long as there is demand and people will pay (regardless of how everyone moans), they will increase the fees because they know people will pay to come here or stay.paradoxical wrote:This would explain a lot. In a normal situation, one would keep the price of a product/service fixed or reasonable and increase the number of sales in order to boost income. In an exploitative model such as this one, they want to reduce the number of sales (number of ILRs granted), but still want to make as much profit as possible hence the exponential growth of the ILR fee..
I agree with you and this scenario can very perfectly be explained by an exploitative model that I mentioned earlier. And that model can also perfectly explain a lot of other evil things that happen around the globe.CR001 wrote:HO know there is 'demand' for their service/visas and as long as there is demand and people will pay (regardless of how everyone moans), they will increase the fees because they know people will pay to come here or stay.
Does this take into account refusals? They keep the fees following refusals too. Moreover, if people who are refused reapply, then this effectively doubles the fees.Ali272 wrote:ILR grants are down more than 50% since 2012. So they need to double the fees, just to make the same amount.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... settlementCR001 wrote:And the source of your statement above???
UKVI should definitely not be making tax payers subsidise anybody's ILR..which won't be subsidised even if the ILR fee were a quarter of what it is at the moment.CR001 wrote:They have the right to charge us whatever they want, taxpayers should not be funding UKVI. It is a once in a lifetime fee anyway.
Am thinking of moving to Germany and had a look at their requirements and feesparadoxical wrote:This would explain a lot. In a normal situation, one would keep the price of a product/service fixed or reasonable and increase the number of sales in order to boost income. In an exploitative model such as this one, they want to reduce the number of sales (number of ILRs granted), but still want to make as much profit as possible hence the exponential growth of the ILR fee..
The issue fully stems that a not insignificant lot are not what you would categorise as 'talent'Pudding1 wrote: Am thinking of moving to Germany and had a look at their requirements and fees
Application for the EU Blue Card - €150
Application for Naturalisation- €250
Germany wants to attract foreign talent. The UK wants to take the piss.
This sentence makes no sense!seasky wrote:The issue fully stems that a not insignificant lot are not what you would categorise as 'talent'
May not be good "English" but it does make sense, well I can get what they are driving at!paradoxical wrote:This sentence makes no sense!seasky wrote:The issue fully stems that a not insignificant lot are not what you would categorise as 'talent'
I agree that the statement by seasky is not as non-sensical as may be thought.timco wrote:May not be good "English" but it does make sense, well I can get what they are driving at!paradoxical wrote:This sentence makes no sense!seasky wrote:The issue fully stems that a not insignificant lot are not what you would categorise as 'talent'
Germany obviously has an abundant capacity to take in people. They have already taken in a million refugees in just one year. And now with the UK heading out of the EU, there is a good chance that Germany will become the destination to head to within the EU, especially given that on my many visits there, everybody has been fluent and at ease with English (unlike in France).Pudding1 wrote:Am thinking of moving to Germany and had a look at their requirements and fees
Application for the EU Blue Card - €150
Application for Naturalisation- €250
Germany wants to attract foreign talent. The UK wants to take the piss.
Greed has been a human constant since the beginning of time and is unlikely to disappear simply because one does not wish it to exist. As regards the "exploitative" model, the economic way to explain it is that the UKV&I is in the market with an inelastic demand and limited supply (how many other countries would economic migrants head to (probably less than 10, counting the EU as one)?) The only way to bring the prices down would be if the people did shop around, by going to different countries to get permanent residencies if they failed in the UK.paradoxical wrote:I agree with you and this scenario can very perfectly be explained by an exploitative model that I mentioned earlier. And that model can also perfectly explain a lot of other evil things that happen around the globe.CR001 wrote:HO know there is 'demand' for their service/visas and as long as there is demand and people will pay (regardless of how everyone moans), they will increase the fees because they know people will pay to come here or stay.
Hang out a bit at T1 Entrepreneur forum and you will see an outsized impression of the absolute low quality of applicants in that route. One would think a business that hires 2 people at min wage for exactly a year is not what the UK had in mind when forming the routesecret.simon wrote:
Yet, as seasky has mentioned, a significant percentage of people who are granted ILR are broadly from outside the PBS system, which is primarily talent-oriented.