Post
by sonrock » Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:48 pm
Hi everyone
After more than 4 months waiting, the HO finally refused our ILR applications. They used 2 main reasons to refuse us:
1. They said that during the time spent outside the UK between Nov/Dec 08 and Sep 09, we could not secure an Entre Clearance visa to go back even if we wished to. It's not because of my wife's treatments the preventing us but my setbacks with PhD applications to get the Tier 4 general visa from going back on time.
2. They said that also they know my children were born and bred here all their lives, they speak English most of the time but they also can speak our own language. Therefore this is nothing exceptional in this case to differentiate ours to others which deserves discretion.
They issued the letters to refuse my application on 7th and my wife's on 8th November. So we had 14 calendar days to lodge an appeal and yesterday, I came to see the law firm who helped us prepare our ILR applications and asked them to do so.
I did write a detailed letter corresponding to the HO's arguments and reasons to refuse us and left at the law firm. Because the solicitor who had helped us prepare our case was not in the office yesterday but another one who is not familiar with. Hopefully he'll read my letter and let me know where to improve and then send it to the court before our hearing which will be confirmed in the future.
However, I'd like to ask for your opinion and experience, how long will it normally take until our hearing day? The solicitor who helped us fax all the form and refusal letters to the tribunal said it'll be around 5-6 months.
As we appealed in time, are our rights still protected accoring to the law?
Please take a look at a main part of our cover letter to the HO. This has not been sent yet and will be discussed with my solicitor later on. Please please feel free to share your own thoughts, it'd be very much appreciated.
The most important point here is the reason that HO used to refused our applications as outlined in point 1 is not correct and misguided. Because we could always apply for an entry visa to go back to the UK anytime during that period, either my wife or myself. We had at least 2 options as the following:
• I had completed my studies with the master course and was entitled to a 2 year post study work visa which was still eligible at that time. There was no restriction that I could not apply from outside or in the UK before leaving. I had and maintained adequate funds in my UK bank account all through the time, I did not commit any crime or default in any immigration rule so I was aware I was entitled and could use it if the health of my wife improved.
• My wife had a referral due to her ill health. She could not complete her studies and required an extra year to achieve this. She too had adequate funds, did not commit any crime or break an immigration rule and was entitled to complete the studies she had paid for. But again, this was only secondary to her health at the time.
I had started the application for a PhD before my wife’s health deteriorated. When my wife was healthy enough to return with me to continue our lives in the UK, the admission only came through in time enough for us to decide to use the visa this would afford as it offered longer term stability (4 years +) to enable me focus on my research rather than the (2 year) post study visa I was entitled to after completing a UK master’s degree or the (1year) extension my wife was entitled to, to complete her master’s degree studies.
The reason is my wife was so ill that she couldn’t do her dissertation properly so she failed in the first attempt whilst couldn’t submit another coursework. However, our university gave her referrals and a second chance to do those. We have her transcript and letter from the university to confirm this because her final results were decided on 23rd October 2009, even after when we came back to the UK.
That means she could always apply for a new Entry Clearance visa from our country to write her dissertation and another coursework in the UK in order to complete her master course; because she needed physical access to academic sources provided by the university such as books and journals in libraries as well as online articles which are only available via the university’s system. After all these done, she would also be able to attend her graduation ceremony held in 28 November 2009. This is within the immigration rule and regulation which is still valid until now.
However, due to her severe illness, trauma and particularly with the advice from the doctor in our country that she should not travel during her treatment with traditional medicines in the early days, we did not apply for the Entry Clearance visa which we were entitled to. In fact, her health conditions at that time didn’t allow us while we knew for certain that we would definitely go back as I received a PhD offer from our university quite early in March 2009.
Nevertheless, due to administrative issues that significantly delay the process, we could not get the Tier 4 general visa and go back within the six months period to start my research at this university, but later on in September with another university, one of the very best in the UK and world. By that time, my wife had already finished 6 months treatment with the doctor in our country and he was happy with her improvements so she could come back to the UK with me.
Please note that she had been close to death and miraculously survived after all these - every doctor said so after seeing her and knowing her medical record. When she first came back to our country in February 2009, she could barely walk and most of the time spent on wheelchairs as she was extremely weak. She had been on wheelchairs all the time after being discharged from the hospital in the UK and during her short time in Poland with her mother.
Not to mention that she felt sorry and horribly bad about herself all the time after our meeting with the consultant. She even thought of committing suicide as the pains, which she was suffering every day from both physically and mentally, were unbearable.
Therefore, when we left the UK in late 2008, the only things existed in our minds were her health and wellbeing. What is the point if she could never recover and die later? Nothing else matters, absolutely not the visa or our continuous stay in the UK because as pointed out earlier, we could gain Entry Clearance visa to go back anytime.
You can clearly see that how tragically and miserably she had been through that period of time and we couldn't do anything more as everything was absolutely out of our control.
If those had not happened to her, both of us could have graduated in 2008, extended our stay within the UK by applying for Tier 1 post-study work visa without any difficulties then later on switch to Tier 4 general visa to conduct my PhD research; and she could have enjoyed her healthy and happy life with me without breaking our continuous stay for more than 6 months from the UK at one point due to her health and infertility treatment in our country. She also could not have had to worry about her chances of becoming a mother again or to cry every day when thinking about children until our first child was born. But all these could never happen, just our wishes.
The Home Office, mistakenly, when giving decisions only focused on the grounds of setbacks with PhD applications and the ability to gain Entry Clearance visa from my perspective, whilst disregarding all other facts as mentioned above which led us to that position.
Unfortunately, they are not only wrong with our ability to gain the Entry Clearance visa anytime during that period, but they also took the human rights matters very lightly and did not consider the rationales behind. It seems they simply used any reasons in order to refuse our applications and did not care about the Human Rights aspects at all in our case.
Please take a look at the above and let me know what you think, it'd be very much appreciated. The solicitor who dealt with us directly is the head of immigration at this big law firm and very busy. He works ony 2 - 3 days a week from the office now, so your thoughts and valueable contributions to us are crucial to win this fight.
I'm looking forward to receiving your feedback and advice soon.
Final point, I've just received an offer for one of the biggest firms in the world. I did not ask them for visa sponsorship in the beginning as I was in the middle of our ILR application. So I applied for my local office outside London which salary doesnt meet the Tier 2 threshold.
Do you think I should contact them and ask for visa sponsorship and swith to any location where it meets the salary requirement? I might need to go for another final interview and presentation with a partner at that location but it's fine for me.
I was in the final 3% who received the offer after an extremely competitive and long application process with 5-6 different stages for a grad trainee position at their firm starting next Sep. So I had the highest mark for most categories being assessed by the partner in the final interview and during the process. So not sure if they are willing to help???
Thank you!