plshelp99 wrote:thanks for the advice.
Again im still unsure, because it would seem intuitive that the 5 yrs PR should not be required in cases of:
a. me being an EU national rather than non eu (therefore automatically entitled to remain)
EU nationals are not automatically allowed to remain. There is 3 months unconditional residence, but thereafter, until permanent residence is achieved, an EU national must be a qualified person or qualify in relationship to someone with a more basic right or permission to be resident.
plshelp99 wrote:b. married to a UK national, therefore the need to also reside for 5 yrs should fall away
Have you the paid the relevant immigration taxes? They are included in the visa application fees and are mostly non-refundable on refusal.
plshelp99 wrote:But apparently there is no concession for my ('lower risk') case and i have to wait in line for same time as someone who is unmarried and non-EU.. seems illogical, but i guess thats the HO intention...
It was decided that the risk of financial failure of the couple was too high, and the qualifying time for ILR was raised from 2 years to 5 years in 2012. At this point, the 3 year residence requirement became anomalous, and only applicable to Irish citizens and those acquiring permanent residence or ILR early. Then in 2014 it was, inadvertently I believe, widened when the freedom from restrictions on stay in the UK was extended from the Irish entering from the Republic to all people entering from the Republic with enforceable EEA rights of entry, except for visaless visa nationals. Thus an Indian EEA family member with a Tier 2 visa benefits, but an Indian EEA family member with a residence card but no visa does not benefit.