- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Immigration historyCR001 wrote:Yes many people wait a long time.
What is your full immigration history?
On what basis did you apply for FLR(FP)??
Anyone who can shed some light on the above?vsoma wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:48 pmHi
We are non-EU parents of a child who has been living in the UK from 01/10/2008. He had just turned 2 when he entered the UK.
Due to unavoidable circumstances we had to apply for FLR (FP) based on our child on 2/9/2016. He was 9 days short for his 10th birthday at the time of application.
After more than a year of waiting, we received the decision today stating that our applications have been refused.
One of the reasons stated is that our son had not lived in the UK continuously for 7 years. I'm really confused as he had lived for 7 years and 11 months at the time of our application. Does it mean that it should be 7 years without any short holidays abroad?
My son has had 4 short holidays in 4 separate years each one about 2-3 weeks. Altogether he's been away for 66 days. Have these short holidays broken his continuity?
Any insight into this would be appreciated.
Why is it unreasonable for your child to leave the UK?Immigration Rule 276 ADE(1)(iv) wrote: The requirements to be met by an applicant for leave to remain on the grounds of private life in the UK are that at the date of application, the applicant:
(iv) is under the age of 18 years and has lived continuously in the UK for at least 7 years (discounting any period of imprisonment) and it would not be reasonable to expect the applicant to leave the UK; or
secret.simon wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:29 pmHas the child either been outside the UK
(a) for more than 6 months at a stretch OR
(b) for a total of 18 months in the 7 years?
See Immigration Rule 276(A).
Why is it unreasonable for your child to leave the UK?Immigration Rule 276 ADE(1)(iv) wrote: The requirements to be met by an applicant for leave to remain on the grounds of private life in the UK are that at the date of application, the applicant:
(iv) is under the age of 18 years and has lived continuously in the UK for at least 7 years (discounting any period of imprisonment) and it would not be reasonable to expect the applicant to leave the UK; or
secret.simon wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:29 pmHas the child either been outside the UK
(a) for more than 6 months at a stretch OR
(b) for a total of 18 months in the 7 years?
See Immigration Rule 276(A).
Why is it unreasonable for your child to leave the UK?Immigration Rule 276 ADE(1)(iv) wrote: The requirements to be met by an applicant for leave to remain on the grounds of private life in the UK are that at the date of application, the applicant:
(iv) is under the age of 18 years and has lived continuously in the UK for at least 7 years (discounting any period of imprisonment) and it would not be reasonable to expect the applicant to leave the UK; or
The Home Office and the judge may take the line that children are inherently adaptable. So points 1-3 & 5 may not be considered unreasonable enough to have the child stay in the UK.vsoma wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2017 9:39 pmWhy is it unreasonable:
- He came to England when he was just 2
- He is in his final year of Primary School now and has never attended school or nursery in any other country other than England
- He does not speak/ read or write any of the local languages in his country of birth
- his only living grand parents are in England living in the same house as him who are also British citizens
- at the time of refusal he has spent 9 years in england
Thanks for your comments. I really don't know what will work in our favour and am a bit fed up now anyway. Will give a last shot with the appeal. In one years' time we would have lived here for 10 years but if the hearing is well before that period and is not in our favour we would just need to go.secret.simon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:08 amThe Home Office and the judge may take the line that children are inherently adaptable. So points 1-3 & 5 may not be considered unreasonable enough to have the child stay in the UK.vsoma wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2017 9:39 pmWhy is it unreasonable:
- He came to England when he was just 2
- He is in his final year of Primary School now and has never attended school or nursery in any other country other than England
- He does not speak/ read or write any of the local languages in his country of birth
- his only living grand parents are in England living in the same house as him who are also British citizens
- at the time of refusal he has spent 9 years in england
As for point 4, the children of most migrants live in a country different from their grandparents anyway. That does not stop migration.
Our biggest negative was that we were applying as a family unit whereas the 7 year rule is intended for single parents with sole custody of the child. So even if the application was going to be approved by the Home office it would have been on an exceptional basis.problem1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:21 pmThis is the situation with most of the people after 8 or 9 yrs we are relay lost. What are the other reason they mentioned in the refusal?. better to consult a good barrister as direct access and get his opinion before you apply, one of my friend did and she manage to win the case. All the best with your appeal.
vsoma wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:02 pmOur biggest negative was that we were applying as a family unit whereas the 7 year rule is intended for single parents with sole custody of the child. So even if the application was going to be approved by the Home office it would have been on an exceptional basis.problem1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:21 pmThis is the situation with most of the people after 8 or 9 yrs we are relay lost. What are the other reason they mentioned in the refusal?. better to consult a good barrister as direct access and get his opinion before you apply, one of my friend did and she manage to win the case. All the best with your appeal.
They mentioned that he hadn't lived here continuously for 7 years. Which I still can't understand as he has only had 4 short holidays which lasted 1-2 weeks each.
They also said that it was ok for my son to move back to his country of birth and that he will not find it difficult to integrate into the education system. Even though he can't speak , read or write the local language they suggested we give language tution!
How long ago was your friend's case?
Thanks doubledee for the positive comments! I too am hoping the judge will show some compassion towards us at the hearing.doubledee wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:50 pm
to be honest, most of the flrfp refusals are copy and paste, same thing they write for everyone. I believe the short holidays don't count, that must have been an error by HO which you should raise in your appeal. I have recently gone through flr(fp) appeal 7 year route which was successful by God's grace. My child had previously been out of the country too a few times for short holidays which didn't count against him. We also own our home and the judge mentioned this in our favour in the determination, you have a strong case which you will most likely win in appeal. My case is very much similar to yours, except for the fact my child was born in the UK and our barrister mentioned at the hearing that he would be able to register as a british citizen next year as an entitlement as he will turn 10 next year.
Appeals/dates are currently taking many months, sometimes up to a year.vsoma wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2017 1:04 pmThanks doubledee for the positive comments! I too am hoping the judge will show some compassion towards us at the hearing.doubledee wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:50 pm
to be honest, most of the flrfp refusals are copy and paste, same thing they write for everyone. I believe the short holidays don't count, that must have been an error by HO which you should raise in your appeal. I have recently gone through flr(fp) appeal 7 year route which was successful by God's grace. My child had previously been out of the country too a few times for short holidays which didn't count against him. We also own our home and the judge mentioned this in our favour in the determination, you have a strong case which you will most likely win in appeal. My case is very much similar to yours, except for the fact my child was born in the UK and our barrister mentioned at the hearing that he would be able to register as a british citizen next year as an entitlement as he will turn 10 next year.
How long did you wait for a hearing date? My solicitor is filing the appeal papers this week. Just wondering how long I'll need to wait before a date!
The appeal date came exactly 1 year after and the appeal date was then 4 months after that. To be honest your case is better than mine on 2 fronts, one being I applied slightly before my son turned 7, so we were outside the rules, you are within the rules, also your child is now older as the first 7 years don't count as much as older 7 years (e.g. age 4 - 11 is stronger than 0-7). So don't stress too much, most of those things you listed are exactly what we listed as insurmountable and it was accepted perfectly, the language one was a main one, that he did not understand and couldn't speak the local language and we stated how that would affect his education back home as he won't be able to go grassroot ^normal^ schools as local language is needed, we stated that the alternative was to go to top private schools which were expensive and couldnt afford. We presented a few emails from those schools to show the high amount of school fees , to be honest the judge made no mention of those at all at both hearing and determination. He even mentioned that taking away my child from his friends at his age he had already formed friendships would be an obstacle. Most people think its difficult to prove insurmountable, not really. 7 year child cases have a very high success rate at appeal from what i gather. You are quite lucky you got an appeal, not every one does, it's just the waiting time is quite unbearable. Our length of stay was also mentioned in the determination and the fact that we entered legally, all those would go in your favour as well. Get a good solicitor/barrister and put your faith in God.vsoma wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2017 1:04 pmThanks doubledee for the positive comments! I too am hoping the judge will show some compassion towards us at the hearing.doubledee wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:50 pm
to be honest, most of the flrfp refusals are copy and paste, same thing they write for everyone. I believe the short holidays don't count, that must have been an error by HO which you should raise in your appeal. I have recently gone through flr(fp) appeal 7 year route which was successful by God's grace. My child had previously been out of the country too a few times for short holidays which didn't count against him. We also own our home and the judge mentioned this in our favour in the determination, you have a strong case which you will most likely win in appeal. My case is very much similar to yours, except for the fact my child was born in the UK and our barrister mentioned at the hearing that he would be able to register as a british citizen next year as an entitlement as he will turn 10 next year.
How long did you wait for a hearing date? My solicitor is filing the appeal papers this week. Just wondering how long I'll need to wait before a date!
Thank you very much doubledee! You have given me a lot of confidence and courage to go through with this case. I am hoping for the best!doubledee wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:26 pm
The appeal date came exactly 1 year after and the appeal date was then 4 months after that. To be honest your case is better than mine on 2 fronts, one being I applied slightly before my son turned 7, so we were outside the rules, you are within the rules, also your child is now older as the first 7 years don't count as much as older 7 years (e.g. age 4 - 11 is stronger than 0-7). So don't stress too much, most of those things you listed are exactly what we listed as insurmountable and it was accepted perfectly, the language one was a main one, that he did not understand and couldn't speak the local language and we stated how that would affect his education back home as he won't be able to go grassroot ^normal^ schools as local language is needed, we stated that the alternative was to go to top private schools which were expensive and couldnt afford. We presented a few emails from those schools to show the high amount of school fees , to be honest the judge made no mention of those at all at both hearing and determination. He even mentioned that taking away my child from his friends at his age he had already formed friendships would be an obstacle. Most people think its difficult to prove insurmountable, not really. 7 year child cases have a very high success rate at appeal from what i gather. You are quite lucky you got an appeal, not every one does, it's just the waiting time is quite unbearable. Our length of stay was also mentioned in the determination and the fact that we entered legally, all those would go in your favour as well. Get a good solicitor/barrister and put your faith in God.