- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
It depends in the first instance whether a Tier 4 sponsor institution is willing to issue a CAS. They would normally only do that for a course at a higher level than your previous student visa. They will also probably want to check why you are returning to education after such a long break, to anticipate any problems with your credibility in a visa interview.
It is not compulsory, but it is also your opportunity to explain and apologise for any previous immigration problems.
Yes, there is a question about medical treatment.
It is not compulsory, but it is also your opportunity to explain and apologise for any previous immigration problems.
I advise you discuss it with your Tier 4 sponsor. They have an international student adviser whose role is to advise their sponsored students on their Tier 4 applications, including issues like this.
From 8 october . Start date counts 08/01/18.Peted wrote: ↑Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:34 amHi!
I know I cannot apply more than 90 days before the date in my CAS. However, there are 2 dates: course start date (08/01/18) and latest start date (22/01/2018). So, from which point can I apply? Is it from 08 Oct, or from 22 Oct?
I've sent the university a message with this question about 20 days ago. No answer yet.
If any of you could say anything about this I'll be very thankful.
No.
No.
Because you didn't, because it is an error that I am sure people have made before, and because they will look up the real number anyway and see that you have nothing to be deceptive about.
It means they have delays in their mail room.
Peted wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:27 pmThanks for replying sah10406!
I hope that's all it means, not meaning a refusal, which could take them more time to process after the decision made e-mail.
Also hope that the fact that mine and my dependant's application were assessed separately (his after mine) is something usual and not bad.
Regards