- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Probably because the ex spouse is non EEA, since the OP said that the divorce certificate has been issued by a non EU country.Richard W wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 11:47 pmWhy should the Home Office care whether you are divorced or not? It would only matter if you claimed to have a spouse or durable partner, or if it mattered who the father of a child of yours was.
Incidentally, are you sure you are divorced? If the divorce was conducted by the diplomatic mission, it might not be valid in English law.
Non of this - no kid, no one gonna claim partnership/ marriage.Richard W wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 11:47 pmWhy should the Home Office care whether you are divorced or not? It would only matter if you claimed to have a spouse or durable partner, or if it mattered who the father of a child of yours was.
Non of this - no kid, no one gonna claim partnership/ marriage.
Incidentally, are you sure you are divorced? If the divorce was conducted by the diplomatic mission, it might not be valid in English law.
Yep, you are right - divorce happened in the diplomatic mission (Russia) because the marriage has been registered in Russia and procedure of divorce is much quicker.
Such is Home Office internal guidance. Chapter 8, section 1 of the Immigration Directorate Instructions currently points to Chapter 8: Family members transitional arrangements, section 1, annex B, recognition of marriage and divorce. Article 4 therein saysAlesandria wrote: ↑Sat Jan 20, 2018 9:50 amIs these true - that divorce was conducted by the diplomatic mission, it might not be valid in English law?
I believe, but I haven't checked, that some of the legal argument from Radwan v. Radwan, quoted in Article 1.1 therein on the validity of marriages at embassies in the UK, also applies to divorces.As a foreign embassy, high commission, consulate or other diplomatic premises are for legal purposes regarded as being inside the United Kingdom, a divorce obtained from any such premises in the United Kingdom is not valid here.
Richard, so grateful for such detailed reply. Is this Immgration rules for nonEEA applying to enter or remain in the UK on the basis of their relationship with a family member who is a British Citizen, settled in the UK or in the UK with refugee leave or humanitarian protection.Richard W wrote: ↑Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:10 pm
Such is Home Office internal guidance. Chapter 8, section 1 of the Immigration Directorate Instructions currently points to Chapter 8: Family members transitional arrangements, section 1, annex B, recognition of marriage and divorce.
S1.6 A foreign embassy or consulate cannot be regarded as a part of a country
outside the British Isles for the purposes of s.45 of the Family Law Act 1986. A
divorce obtained at a foreign embassy or consulate in England cannot therefore be
regarded as valid in English law. The court case of Radwan -v- Radwan, in which a
Talaq divorce was obtained at the United Arab Republic Consulate-General in this
country, led to this decision. However, where the hearing has taken place in another
country and the embassy has merely acted as a Registry Office in issuing the divorce
document, the divorce may be regarded as valid.
I don't believe the embassy has so acted - but you may know different. A very relevant precedent is given in Russian couple’s divorce ‘not valid’ in UK despite wife’s remarriage, which references the judgement in Solovyev v Solovyeva [2014] EWFC 1546 (15 May 2014).Alesandria wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:55 pmHowever, where the hearing has taken place in another
country and the embassy has merely acted as a Registry Office in issuing the divorce document, the divorce may be regarded as valid.
Subsequently,Richard W wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2018 8:52 pmI don't believe the embassy has so acted - but you may know different. A very relevant precedent is given in Russian couple’s divorce ‘not valid’ in UK despite wife’s remarriage, which references the judgement in Solovyev v Solovyeva [2014] EWFC 1546 (15 May 2014).Alesandria wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:55 pmHowever, where the hearing has taken place in another
country and the embassy has merely acted as a Registry Office in issuing the divorce document, the divorce may be regarded as valid.
Solovyev v Solovyev [2014] EWFC 20 (09 June 2014) wrote:3. ...Hence it became necessary for the petitioner to reactivate his petition for divorce.
....
6. In these circumstances the petitioner is entitled to the decree of divorce which he seeks. I accordingly hereby pronounce a decree nisi of divorce.
Did I get it right that now I have to file divorce using standard procedure (file divorce in court and etc) or after non-valid weird divorce in Russian embassy I should seek lawyers who are able to sort my case in court which likely will cost me fortune ?vinny wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:58 amSubsequently,Solovyev v Solovyev [2014] EWFC 20 (09 June 2014) wrote:3. ...Hence it became necessary for the petitioner to reactivate his petition for divorce.
....
6. In these circumstances the petitioner is entitled to the decree of divorce which he seeks. I accordingly hereby pronounce a decree nisi of divorce.