- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
You stated in your previous post that your visa expired in January, so if your current application is refused, you don't have a 'current visa'.make an immediate re-application here in the UK with an application that was rejected but applied for prior to current visa expiry.
Indeed, haha. Patience is probably the biggest required virtue of every member on this board at some point, eh?CR001 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:51 pmNo worries.
Suggest sit tight and wait for the outcome, try not to stress too much.
You will have 14 days to either appeal (if given appeal rights), apply for administrative review, or submit a new application.
You stated in your previous post that your visa expired in January, so if your current application is refused, you don't have a 'current visa'.make an immediate re-application here in the UK with an application that was rejected but applied for prior to current visa expiry.
However, I am finding examples that seem to directly negate each other that are greatly confusing to me. (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... n-v1.0.pdf)If an applicant makes a new application for entry clearance, leave to enter or leave to
remain and then makes an administrative review application in respect of a previous
decision, the administrative review application will be rejected.
Furthermore, there is a direct statement in the section 3c/3d guidance, which concerns me. Understanding that I am currently covered by section 3c leave (applied for FLR prior to visa expiry while awaiting decision), the following statement suggests that any right of appeal that is given does not allow for a new application:Example scenario 4
An applicant submits application A in time. They transition to 3C leave and
application A is refused, and the decision is served with a right of appeal. The
applicant then submits application B, whilst still on 3C leave (for example, before the
time limit to appeal has ended)
In this scenario, if application B is a human rights claim or an asylum claim,
application B must be considered. If application B is any other type of application,
then it must be returned as void as there is no longer an application to vary. For
further information on 3C leave see: Leave extended by section 3C (and leave
extended by section 3D in transitional cases).
Example scenario 5
An applicant submits application A (either in or out of time). Application A is refused
and the decision is served, with a right to Administrative Review. The applicant then
submits application B.
In this scenario, the submission of application B brings the administrative review
period and therefore any period of 3C leave, to an end. Application B cannot be a
variation of application A, because the decision on application A has already been
decided. Application B should be considered as a new application.
While the person’s leave is extended by section 3C they cannot make a new
application for variation of leave. This is because Section 3C (4) states:
‘A person may not make an application for variation of his leave to enter or remain in
the United Kingdom while that leave is extended by this section.”
However section 3C (5) does allow the person to amend their existing application at
any time before it is decided by the Secretary of State. The application to amend the
existing application has to be a valid application. Where there is a difference in the
fee between the initial variation application and the amended application any
additional fee must be paid.
Thus, I am entirely confused by the above. The only thing I can derive from this is that if you are given the right to appeal, you cannot put in a fresh application, while if you are given the right to AR, you can put in a fresh application which ends section 3c and AR privileges?If an applicant has made an application for administrative review which is pending,
the administrative review application ceases to be pending if the applicant makes an
application for entry clearance, leave to enter or leave to remain. The application for
administrative review ceases to be pending because the effect of making the fresh
application is to withdraw the administrative review...
...When an administrative review is pending against refusal of an application, if a
person submits a fresh application the administrative review will no longer be
pending...Where an administrative review is no longer pending, section 3C leave comes to an
end.
Thanks for that. In this instance if no right of appeal is afforded, one is basically either able to ask for administrative review or leave the country? According to the above quotes from guidance, I seem to think one could submit a new application in this instance if AR was the only option besides departure; the above quotes suggest section 3c leave ends immediately upon terminating AR rights through the submission of a fresh application, thus negating possible conflict with a new application not being able to be submitted during afforded section 3c leave.
Ok, I understand. I'm not interested in an appeal or AR whatsoever, but rather the most efficient way to make a new application - preferably with being able to use a premium service centre if the result of my current application ends as I presume it quickly shall.
Another note for my clarification - you twice mention human rights claim. Is a FLR (m) innately considered a human rights claim? As we met the requirements for FLR (m) but were only lacking in the evidence department, unless the above is true, I would then expect that no right of appeal will be given but perhaps the right to AR instead. We did not make any explicit human rights claims in our application, unless such application is considered so itself.
Hi, I submitted a FLR (m) application prior to a tier 4 expiry. We met all the requirements, but had trouble evidencing for the 12 month income requirement route; as of 5 days after, we could have met the 6 month route without any issue. Immediately, within a week of application we sent off the additional payslip and bank statements with a cover letter stating that we now also met the 6 month route with full evidence. Sadly, I have found forum conversations with others who did the exact same thing - always a refusal. Thus, I am now trying to get ahead of the game for what I 99% expect to be a refusal hitting my post box any day. We are simply trying to determine the quickest and most efficient to re-apply without having to leave the country, should our intuition be unfortunately correct.shakil.saif79 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2018 9:03 pmWhat is the outcome of your initial application.
you may be able to submit your last payslip while your application is under process. There is no harm in trying. good luck
Yeah, thanks. We shall see!shakil.saif79 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2018 9:56 pmhope for the best. it varies on person to person and case to case... so hope for good and accept my best wishes. did you submit p60 of last year etc. a letter from employer stating annual salary and type of job (contract/permanent) may help.
Thanks for checking! No, I'm afraid not. (Could be a good or bad thing in my shoes, haha). I requested that my documents (passports) be returned a few days ago and I've been told that they reject returning your documents if they have rejected your application already, so I might get an indication there.shakil.saif79 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:25 amany news yet? i wish you succeed in your application.