Bhavin002 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2017 10:53 am
In 2nd. AR, I argued on average 30 hrs. Per week throughout the 12 months pwriod. The solicitor advised they won't accept new docs-payslips. Lawyer who made AR review grounds didn't use any other arguments. So HO still remained the decision. It's a shame. I applied new application within 14 days of time given. I hope to hear anything in the January from HO as I experienced they never delayed in my case.
The problem is I have to stay with the business illegally until I get visa.
Many thanks,
Unfortunately, it appears your AR argument was weak. You had two good arguments that were discussed (
uk-tier-1-entrepreneur-visas/1st-admin- ... l#p1544311):
1. The guidance set out 120 hrs/month as a FT job
2. If that was not acceptable, evidential flexibility should have been used to ask for more payslips.
The average 30 hrs per week was a non-starter as it was clear total hours was never acceptable.
Did you not share the advice you received on this forum with your lawyer ? If so, did your lawyer share with you why the above two arguments were not acceptable ?
I am sorry if it looks like I am digging up something that is already past and cannot be changed, but it will be helpful to others in future.
Don't worry too much about staying "illegally" in the business. Since your wife is not impacted, the only serious impact is that you can't draw salary (it should not stop you from getting a loan or dividends from your business). It might take time but your fresh application should be successful.
My comments are in no way meant to be advisory. I have no professional knowledge of immigration. These are based on my own experience, convictions and personal interpretation of publicly available information.