Nothing has changed. The guidelines and paper form always referred to 120 hours/month as a FT job. In spite of that, they have been rejecting cases where it was more than 120 hrs with the explanation that it does not meet 130 hrs.regularuser wrote: ↑Thu Jan 11, 2018 2:30 pmHi Marcnath,
I was just trying to fill online Set(O) application form and found below text under Job requirement section:
"Created 2 full-time equivalent jobs
Employee details:
Provide the details of all employees who filled this job for the required 12 month period
If more than one employee filled the role during the 12-month period, because one or more employee left the job during that time, include the details of each person. Alternatively, you can combine the working hours of two part-time workers whose jobs existed during those 12 months, provided this totals 30 hours per week or more (or 120 hours per month). You can add additional employees after selecting ‘Save and continue’.
it means will they consider Employee 2 as a full time emplyee ?
Thanks
This is probably because the CWs use the immigration rules (which only specifies 30 hrs/week, which equals 130 hrs/month) and don't follow the guidance (which is a help document for applicants and the CW may not even have read it).
So, as I have mentioned before, you can try that but it has a risk.
