- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
For clarity, when you say 'reilgious marraige', do you mean an Islamic Marriage performed within the UK??been religiously married on the 1st February 2017
Also, this doesn't make sense. He would not need to appeal a decision if he was granted and issued DLRand granted him discretionary leave till march 2011 (with rights to appeal) because he was unoccupied child
my husband did not appeal the dicison
That what i thought but. Thats what it say's exact wording " although the original decision engaged a right of appeal the appellant chose not to exercise this"
This would not be accepeted as a valid marriage then. You would therefore be considered unmarried partners.
Was the appeal relevant to the failed asylum application??diamaond87 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 3:28 pmThat what i thought but. Thats what it say's exact wording " although the original decision engaged a right of appeal the appellant chose not to exercise this"
then i goes on to say
"on march 2011 an application for further leave to remain....."
ok found it: so he came over illegally on 19 september 2009.CR001 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 3:43 pmWas the appeal relevant to the failed asylum application??diamaond87 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 3:28 pmThat what i thought but. Thats what it say's exact wording " although the original decision engaged a right of appeal the appellant chose not to exercise this"
then i goes on to say
"on march 2011 an application for further leave to remain....."
Did he then submit a DLR application in March 2011?
It is very important to list the specific dates of everything and timeline of events for members to be able to offer any advice.
What happened to this application?16th march 2011- filled out a HPDL form for extension of Discretionary leave
It is still not clear what right of appeal or application this is referring to??Thats what it say's exact wording " although the original decision engaged a right of appeal the appellant chose not to exercise this"
then i goes on to say
"on march 2011 an application for further leave to remain....."
19th September 2011: this got refused with the rights to appeal my husband appealed on the 8th October 2011
Why did this get refused? I also thought there were no appeal rights for those granted DLR.diamaond87 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 4:38 pm19th September 2011: this got refused with the rights to appeal my husband appealed on the 8th October 2011
20 December 2011 this went to tribunal service he tells me courts and the appeal got refused and was ment to leave the country (uk) this is when he absconded and has been illegal ever since.
That what read on the flr(m) application the requirements you need to meet as partner. "The current stay in the UK must be lawful" So might have to go for flr(fp).
Hi Vinnyvinny wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 9:38 amAsk them. They may have meant initially under the 10 year route. After grant of FLR(FP), he won't be an overstayer. If he satisfies the requirements under the 5-year route, then he may switch to the FLR(M) under 5-year route.