- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
thanks for the clarification CR001. I only hope that Lounes Case at least will confirm that we (EA spouse) never broke our treaty rights by becoming BC. If this is the truth, our Non EA spose 5 years would have never been broken, then the worse case scenario for them will be having to get another 5 years RC and then, that will be enough for them to apply for PR under the ILR long residence settlement. This is what i meant in my original statement above.CR001 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:14 pm10 year route ILR is an application under the UK Immigration rules and these are the rules that have to be met. To use time spent as a non-EU spouse of an EU citizen under the EU rules towards 10 years ILR, the applicant must prove that their time was 'qualified', i.e. that the EU spouse was exercising treaty rights. Simply 'residing' in the UK is not sufficient.reynaldogr wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:08 pmwhat do you mean? non EU spouse is automatically a qualified person as the sponsor (EA national) derives their rights to the EA spouse (Non EA national). Not sure if i misunderstood your statement.CR001 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:56 pmNot true. It is NOT an entitlement!reynaldogr wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:48 pmit may be due to the fact that after 10 years of legally living in the UK on any route or a combination of them, you will be entitle to PR by law? but TBH I'm not so familiar with this topic.
For ILR based on 10 years long residence, you must meet the strict criteria of 10 years legal stay. Any time spent as the spouse of an EU citizen, must be valid, i.e. the EU spouse must be a qualified person exercising treaty rights for the WHOLE time that you are claiming time under the EU rules and you have to submit substantial evidence of the EU spouse being qualified.
TBH, don't want to be rude, bu every time some of you write something in this forum i ended up more confuse that I'm now, and I'm pretty certain that i will never get a feedback on this questions. Your intervention are welcomed but please be consistence and bear in mind you are talking with a non-law-minded people so be plain and crystal clear on what you are trying to say.
Many thanks
EU rules and UK Immigration rules are separate and completely different and independent of each other.
Please correct me if I am wrong, UK amended EEA regulations following McCarthy decision, to my understanding what she was trying to do was simply using her dual nationality to accommodate her Partner to avail that opportunity, it did not work out in her favor and we are now paying for it too. Now, back then HO amended the law not just for residence card application but for every other application following McCarthy (including PRC) that Dual national family members have to go through Uk immigration rules. Based on that I am assuming that they have to implement Lounes decision on a bigger scale and we should be covered just like we were suffering because of McCarthy. And that tweet which says Success, the guy mentioned that UK agreed to amend EEA regulation, I am not a law expert but you just cannot implement a portion of something for a small group, (for like Lounes) and if they do, someone like us will fight again for it and HO has to amend it again and I don't think so they want to go through this again. We are handful of people who made a genuine mistake, but we won't let them treat us like third nationals, most of us are paying taxes and have already made this country our home. The bottom line is (may be its too early to say but) we don't have to go through UK immigration rules or go back and reapply, in worse case another 5 years residence card will be issued or we have to reapply for it on a different application form. And i think it is already a big success because under uk immigration rules you were not just looking at another 6 years but also around £7000 in fees, which kinda worked out for us here just in £65.silverman123 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:12 pm@Reynaldogr
NON EU FAMILY MEMBER IS COVERED BY ARTICLE 21 TFEU
AND MUST NOT BE STRICTER THAN THOSE WHO PROVIDED BY THE DIRECTIVE 2004/38EC.
People in lounes position will be treated Like other people who has the righ to stay on directive.
Must not be stricter means
Coast of the application.
Processing time of the application.
The same length of the residence.
The same right of applying for permanent residence.
He will be treated Like EU FAMILY MEMBER.
NOT less than who provided by Directive of any of the rights.
Lets guess something what do you think HO will do if one of us apply for his/her permanent residence??? What is in their favour to refuse our application???
Can we discuss it from this point please?
Can you guys share your opinions please?
Thanks for the tips silverman123! i have found the above-mentioned responds. The latest one as well. This is definitely excellent news. I reckon HO has some sort of preliminary guidance to our cases now. I had asked to Further Nationality Inquiries something similar than A AWAN, 3x weeks ago (after receiving the email confirmation by the HO that Lounes Case is acknowledge), so hopefully i will be having a positive respond soon as well. Keep you posted.silverman123 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 28, 2018 11:21 pmHey guys.
Another update and different date
Another confirmation from home office for people who are looking to apply for permanent residence.
Good news keep coming
Once again he is not covered by TA
Dear..........
Thank you for the email,
Your conditions/rights to exercise your rights as an EEA national dependant will not change when your spouse becomes a British Citizen. When you apply for Permanent Residence the application will be considered on the basis that you remain the spouse/dependant of an EEA National.
Regards
Xxxxxxx
UK Visas and Immigration