- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
If HO has accepted the 27K as part of your initial application as invested, then you do not need to provide evidence even of that for extension. So, you can claim that without evidence.Fouzia Naaz wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:22 pmHi,
Tier 1 Initial application (IT CONSULTANCY) was made on 18/08/2014 refusal received on 10/2014 with appeal rights and the judge has allowed the appeal got the visa 04/12/2015
• The application was£50k of which £27k(most of them were cash deposits, transferred by friends directly to sole trader account and some small amounts invested by me through my personal account) invested before the application £23k was available in the bank third-party funds.
Reasons for refusal were:
• HO did not accept the funds invested £27k
• Services provided by my are company below NQF level 4
• Same trading name and premises were used for phone repair shop they got the old pictures from Google
The appeal was allowed based on new pictures of premises, IT Contracts, Advertisement, Invoices and Bank statements provided with the application.
Confusion with Extension application!
• We registered LTD Company on 11/2013, however, could not open the business bank account because of multiple reasons –address, length of visa remaining. We continued to the Ltd company transaction on sole trader account on my name till we got the visa approved(12/2015)
• Most of our funds spent (£27k +£23k)through sole trader account and we opened business bank account opened in 01/2016 we invested about £15k
My solicitor suggested
• Even though initially HO has accepted 27k they might raise concern because transactions sources are not clear and it was not into business account.
• HO may not accept £23K as they were made available and spent in sole trader account
Recommended solution by solicitor: transfer £50k before making Extension application, as a director write off previous loan and new loan agreement for new £50k.
The company was in losses previous 4 years it is profitable in the current year.
Please let me know if he is right. I think to be a safe side not to write of the previous investment, HO has accepted the previous amount and bank account they may accept it this time as well.
Kind Regards
It is the jobs that have to last 12 months, not employees
You can do the amendments. It may raise scrutiny though I doubt it. But anyway it is not against the immigration rules to amend accounts, so you can’t be refused just because of that.fou001 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:12 amThanks marcnath for your reply.
I am new member in the forum I was not aware how to post topic.
I was in opinion to amend the accounts to reflect Appropriate figures of DIRECTOR LOAN.
in case HO ask for any further documents after application.
My concern is Amendments submitted to companies house will reflect on companies house website.HO may be suspicious.
I will appreciate any valuable suggestion as you guys have tremendous experience about these application issues.
Kind Regards.
Is this Notes to the account or Director Loan agreement ? You seem to have mixed up the two.fou001 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:37 pmDear all,
I have few questions about notes to the accounts.Please confirm if they meet HO guidelines.
Notes:
Creditors: amounts falling due after one year 2017 2016
Director Loan (Unsecured Loan) xxxx xxxxx
The director loan to the company is interest free, unsecured and subordinated in favour of third party creditors of the company. The loan is repayable immediate after 5 years of loan's first payment to the directors or the company.
Loans 2017 2016
Loans not wholly repayable within five years:
Instalments falling due for payment after more than five years xxxxx xxxxx
A director of the company agrees to lend £50,000 to the company, of
which part of amount will come from third party creditors. The Loan of £XXXX made available to the company as on 30 November 2017. Third party creditor B has transferred XXX directly to the business bank account on 27 April 2014 on behalf of A.
B is a third party creditor and not obliged to monitor or verify how any amount under
Loan Agreement is used. The Loan agreement is between director and the company.
I have seen many refusals on this because accounts. Please can anybody confirm is this sufficient.
Thanks
Ok. I hope you have a separate Director Loan agreement also.fou001 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:50 pmThese are notes to the accounts. The third party transfer was made on 16/04/2015 to my sole trader account ( before 19/11/2015).
08/2014 initial application was made there were documents provided to HO regarding these funds made available to support my business(Third party agreement).
The highlighted portion above is plain wrong , so you can ignore any solicitor who gave you that advice. That rule is applicable only for investment after Nov 2015.fou001 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 4:36 pmThat is the biggest concern I have what do you recommend should I claim those funds - If I want to claim I must submit the bank statement( told by accountant and solicitor)
or
I have the saving of £50k available I can transfer those funds.
as I have mentioned in my previous posts
Investment issues:
1.£27K (Initial application invested accepted by the home office, even though there were cash deposits)
2.£24k (Third party funds agreement accepted by HO) During the judicial review my solicitor asked as to transfer these funds to sole trader account.
3. We did not have the business bank account until 01/01/2016 even though I was a director of a limited company.
I don't understand what the best fix to this problems, I have been to many solicitors every one has the different view. That's when I started following this forum.
I have time till 04/12/2018 for application and I have £50k savings.
I don't want to take any risk with my application as I HAVE MY FAMILY AND BUSINESS in the UK.