- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
If she applies after her student visa has expired, which she would be doing, then there is no right of appeal in country. They've made the best decision in applying from the States.ginoT wrote:sMinty - probably a wise decision although if you apply withing 28 days and it is rejected AFTER the 28days (even if you get a response 6months later), you still will be able to appeal and no deportation proceedings apply.
Can you clarify where it says that you can appeal a refusal if the application was made after your visa has expired.ginoT wrote:well, they might have to do the JR route but I'm guessing it's not everyone's cup of tea
can you clarify 320 (7B) (i) for us all in that case?
Well they can reject it based on it being submitted after the visa has expired, you only have to read this forum to see that people have submitted their application a day late and it's been rejected for that reason alone. Whether that's right or wrong is another matter altogether and one that's not worth going into on this thread as the OP has already made up their mind.ginoT wrote:meats - you kind of win on this. There is no right of appeal, but they can't reject the application purely the basis that it was made after the visa's expiry.
I'm sure we'll both agree that the people working for the HO both at home and abroad are, on the main, incompetent. You can have a water tight case and they'll reject it for one reason or another yet the next person could have the weakest case ever and their visa will be approved. I have never worked for the HO, but before i went travelling i temped at the Rural Payments Agency. Their horror stories are quite easy to find and having worked there i can see why quite a lot of farmers committed suicide.ginoT wrote:If the application is otherwise in tiptop shape, then there should be no reason to reject the application. If the HO make up some reason which is clealy not true or does not correspond to the docs sent, you can challenge them in a JR. You'll need deep pockets for this so it's not to everyone's taste - as such the majority of people, as in this case, will give up their jobs, travel half way around the world, etc etc all for the wants of bureaucracy for no real benefit to anyone incl the HO.
No intentions of unless it's necessary, in this case it definitely isn't.ginoT wrote:Anyway, we've already had our little difference of opinion on this, haven't we? so don't make another scene
If you apply after your initial visa has expired then the no appeal option is correct in my opinion. What i find disgusting mind is that UK citizens have to pay fees to bring their partners here in the first place.sMinty wrote:We asked the Immigration Enquiries Bureau and they said the same about getting no right to appeal if her FLR(M) application is rejected. Personally, I think that it's disgusting that they can take away someone's right to appeal. Unfortunately, though, they make the rules.