- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Course they do - u could be anyone claiming ur estranged missus was exercising treaty right - u can't deny they would need proof.sleeper wrote:I’ve spoken with her many times for the last month. She is not willing to cooperate. The question was, do they have rights to ask me those documents. I couldn’t find anything in relation to that in 2006 Regulation. I think the paragraph regarding retention of residency rights was created to apply independently.
What’s about domestic violence cases? Do they have to provide the payslips/employment letter too?
Could you recommend a good immigration solicitor, specializing in EU law?
Sorry - I am the victim of a liquid lunch....sleeper wrote:What do you mean by that ('could be anyone claiming ur estranged missus'). I’ve got RC which proves that I was a family member of an EEA national, and HO should have records on their system. They have checked all our documents (her + my passports + supporting docs) on the point of EEA2 application. I have proves that we lived together. The only thing that I don’t have is the proof that she was exercised her treaty rights on the time of divorce, and I mentioned before the Directive does not state that I have to provide it to them. Just want to clarify on which grounds do they ask to provide it…
100% right Obie. UKBA is just twisting the Directive as they want to. But it will not last longer. There will be a well harsh UKBA soon as elections are not far and they have to release their figures to lure general public for votes to support Labour (Which I doubt they will get). It is quite unfair that a public sector independant department acts on what ministers want them to do. Let see how long this horse is going to run by its own.Obie wrote:You will not need to provide the identity of the EEA national again, if you were previously issued a Resident Card under Directive 2004/38EC.
In your case, the passport of the EEA national will not be required. However, you will need to provide evidence that in the period immediately leading to the Decree Absolute being passed, she was exercising EU treaty rights in the UK.
UK border agency added a clause which i think is incorrect. They said inorder to qualify, the EU national family member should have been exercising treaty rights up to the time the decree absolute was issued.
The directive correctly states that in the period immediately leading up to the initiation of the divorce proceeding, which is application for decree nisi, the family member should be exercising treaty rights.
This is apparently a gross misinterpretation of the Diatta Vs Germany ruling.
well that almost unswers my question, but in my case my ex has agreed to help but will only be back to the UK in January to study, my decree nisi hasn't been pronouced yet, should I cancel?Obie wrote:You will not need to provide the identity of the EEA national again, if you were previously issued a Resident Card under Directive 2004/38EC.
In your case, the passport of the EEA national will not be required. However, you will need to provide evidence that in the period immediately leading to the Decree Absolute being passed, she was exercising EU treaty rights in the UK.
UK border agency added a clause which i think is incorrect. They said inorder to qualify, the EU national family member should have been exercising treaty rights up to the time the decree absolute was issued.
The directive correctly states that in the period immediately leading up to the initiation of the divorce proceeding, which is application for decree nisi, the family member should be exercising treaty rights.
This is apparently a gross misinterpretation of the Diatta Vs Germany ruling.
I rather think there has been a breach of the Data Protection Act here somehwere, how'd anyone like someone else querying their employment status with their employer - they've no right.JustinKing wrote:Hope you are well, if you dont mind me asking, how did you manage to get confirmation from your ex wife's employer that she was infact employed.
I was thinking along the same lines with regards to the ILR and the freedom of information act.
I have since sent in my letter stating that my ex wife is not being very helpfull and I cannot supply the HO those documents in the specified time which they detailed on the letter I received from them.
I suspect that this would be rejected and that I will have to appeal.
Thanks for your post, and best of luck
Justin
sleeper wrote:Just to let everyone who is interested know, that I retained my rights of residence. Application form sent in January 2010 received mid June 2010 (4.5 month waiting). Documents sent to HO: 1. Passport + EEA2 form + covering letter 2. Letter confirming my ex employment for a year before decree absolute is issued. 3. My P60’s + payslips 4. Decree absolute. 5. Bills, bank statements, credit card statements and other docs (both names).
Any questions, please ask…
Good luck to everyone and thank you for your advice.