- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
It does happen. I (non-EU spouse of a Swiss national) applied to the French embassy just the 2nd time round and was issued with a 3-year schengen visa.tusken wrote:in theory a schengen visa can be issued for up to 5 years but this never seems to happen.
WOW! My wife applied for many Schengen-Visas, and they were never issued for longer than our actually planned trip. (Sometimes 2 or 3 days only!)Plum70 wrote:...3-year schengen visa...
Before moving here I thought the Swiss are strange people sitting in the mountains. (Not exactly like that, but similar.)Plum70 wrote:How is CH treating you and your spouse? Well worth the move I guess. We should be there this winter exploring Lucerne and Neuchatel...
You should not have paid. Visas for family-members must be free of charge. Since she charged you, they might also have put you in another category, which would indeed prompt for the mentioned papers...chibage wrote:...and asked me to pay £24 for their fee. I paid the money...
Just a sidenote, acknowledging that this is cited from the Embassy, and not from you, dear chibage: It should be "Belgian Embassy". I´m not saying that because my English is so great, but because I´m Belgian, and "Belgium Embassy" just hurts in the ears... and such crap from the Embassy itself? Ouch.Belgian Embassy wrote:...Please note that the Belgium Embassy...
No, they do not have the right to ask for this. The grounds for not being allowed to ask are in 2004/38/EC:chibage wrote:so question is, do they have a right to ask for this information???
This is interpreted, at least by the European Commission, as obliging you to only prove that you fall under this law. As such they have to give you the visa based on:Article 5
Right of entry
1. (...)
2. Family members who are not nationals of a Member State
shall only be required to have an entry visa in accordance with
Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 or, where appropriate, with
national law. For the purposes of this Directive, possession of
the valid residence card referred to in Article 10 shall exempt
such family members from the visa requirement.
Member States shall grant such persons every facility to obtain
the necessary visas. Such visas shall be issued free of charge as
soon as possible and on the basis of an accelerated procedure.
'Belgian Visa'.applicant09 wrote:I 'll put some info about Belgium visa
ILR is NOT a residience card of a EU family member, this was discussed last week in another thread.ca.funke wrote:You should not have paid. Visas for family-members must be free of charge. Since she charged you, they might also have put you in another category, which would indeed prompt for the mentioned papers...chibage wrote:...and asked me to pay £24 for their fee. I paid the money...
Just a sidenote, acknowledging that this is cited from the Embassy, and not from you, dear chibage: It should be "Belgian Embassy". I´m not saying that because my English is so great, but because I´m Belgian, and "Belgium Embassy" just hurts in the ears... and such crap from the Embassy itself? Ouch.Belgian Embassy wrote:...Please note that the Belgium Embassy...
No, they do not have the right to ask for this. The grounds for not being allowed to ask are in 2004/38/EC:chibage wrote:so question is, do they have a right to ask for this information???
This is interpreted, at least by the European Commission, as obliging you to only prove that you fall under this law. As such they have to give you the visa based on:Article 5
Right of entry
1. (...)
2. Family members who are not nationals of a Member State
shall only be required to have an entry visa in accordance with
Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 or, where appropriate, with
national law. For the purposes of this Directive, possession of
the valid residence card referred to in Article 10 shall exempt
such family members from the visa requirement.
Member States shall grant such persons every facility to obtain
the necessary visas. Such visas shall be issued free of charge as
soon as possible and on the basis of an accelerated procedure.Last but not least, you may even travel without a visa. Reason and grounds can be read >>here<<.
- Both passports AND
- your marriage-certificate
I hope you will enjoy your trip to my country. That is - everything after passport-control. Before it won´t be pleasant...
yes, UK National ILR is NOT a resident card issued under Article 10 of 2004/38/EC,MelC wrote: ILR is NOT a residience card of a EU family member, this was discussed last week in another thread.
the debateable point seems to be ~ when a person has entered a country under "domestic" immigration rules, (ie: the UK and has ILR) then going on holiday/visiting to a "schengen" country, where you are NOT invoking the directve, means you fall under "standard" Schengen rules.
and because you are in the UK under domestic immigration rules NOT EU rules you again have not invoked the directive.
No-one seems lear on it, everyone falls on one side of the fence or the other.
As far as I can see, the directive can be taken very literally and liberally, the ECJ certainly do, BUT how each EU state determine who is under the directive and who isn't varies ~ there is no uniformity or conformity anywhere.acme4242 wrote:yes, UK National ILR is NOT a resident card issued under Article 10 of 2004/38/EC,MelC wrote: ILR is NOT a residience card of a EU family member, this was discussed last week in another thread.
the debateable point seems to be ~ when a person has entered a country under "domestic" immigration rules, (ie: the UK and has ILR) then going on holiday/visiting to a "schengen" country, where you are NOT invoking the directve, means you fall under "standard" Schengen rules.
and because you are in the UK under domestic immigration rules NOT EU rules you again have not invoked the directive.
No-one seems lear on it, everyone falls on one side of the fence or the other.
But, when the family are going on holiday or visiting another EU state, this
trip is covered under 2004/38/EC
So any required Schengen visas are free, accelerated application
procedure, and every facility must be afforded.
But, if the non-EU family members is travelling alone on holiday or
visiting another EU state , (NOT invoking the directve) then yes,
"standard" Schengen rules apply.
No privileges.
Certain EU states e.g. Romania are not so fussy about the travelling
alone bit, And grant equal privileges to the non-EU family member
regardless if they are accompanied or joining the EU citizen or not.
Whereas other EU states, e.g. Germany are very mean on this restriction.
A service fee charged by an external provider is still payable,chibage wrote:Just to say, when I queried why I was being charged for the visa the lady at VFS checking my paper work told me that the visa was indeed free. She claimed that the money I paid was the administration fee that vfs charge to handle the application. She said if it was the embassy processing the application directly, then they definetly would not have charged me.
Visa Code 2010 wrote: Article 17
Service fee
1. An additional service fee may be charged by an external
service provider referred to in Article 43. The service fee shall
be proportionate to the costs incurred by the external service
provider while performing one or more of the tasks referred to
in Article 43(6).
2. The service fee shall be specified in the legal instrument
referred to in Article 43(2).
3. Within the framework of local Schengen cooperation,
Member States shall ensure that the service fee charged to an
applicant duly reflects the services offered by the external
service provider and is adapted to local circumstances.
Furthermore, they shall aim to harmonise the service fee
applied.
4. The service fee shall not exceed half of the amount of the
visa fee set out in Article 16(1), irrespective of the possible
reductions in or exemptions from the visa fee as provided for
in Article 16(2), (4), (5) and (6).
5. The Member State(s) concerned shall maintain the possiÂ
bility for all applicants to lodge their applications directly at
its/their consulates.
No, no answer from timatic-IATA, these guys might just aboutMelC wrote: As far as I can see, the directive can be taken very literally and liberally, the ECJ certainly do, BUT how each EU state determine who is under the directive and who isn't varies ~ there is no uniformity or conformity anywhere.
an aside ~ have you had a reply from "timatic"? Im still stranded in North Africa unable to book a ferry as they insist on "schengen visa conditions!!
which highlights again that within the EU and outside the EU is much more of a nightmare that you can imagine!!
Timitic IATA wrote: Many thanks for your mail.
We are currently investigating this matter, in light of the new Visa Code that came into effect this year and are current awaiting clarification from the EC in Brussels on family members who are not residents within the EEA and Switzerland.
Kind regards,
Database Publisher
IATA Netherlands Data Publications
I think there is so much that is not clear, I see your point exactly, as an EU citizen has the right to remain in any other state for up to 3 months ~ then their no EU spouse also has that right, I don't think the directive was intended to cover holidays etc, and the financial losses on the Schengen Visas is something that someone has to bear and no state is going to be happy about that ~ and i still think that where the driretive derived from, and that it is based on economic movement I think that at some point it will have to be overhauled, and those under domestic immigration initially, might not be covered, then i am sure there will be the issue of discrimination ~ the EU needs to get to grips with this and quickly!!!acme4242 wrote:yes, UK National ILR is NOT a resident card issued under Article 10 of 2004/38/EC,MelC wrote: ILR is NOT a residience card of a EU family member, this was discussed last week in another thread.
the debateable point seems to be ~ when a person has entered a country under "domestic" immigration rules, (ie: the UK and has ILR) then going on holiday/visiting to a "schengen" country, where you are NOT invoking the directve, means you fall under "standard" Schengen rules.
and because you are in the UK under domestic immigration rules NOT EU rules you again have not invoked the directive.
No-one seems lear on it, everyone falls on one side of the fence or the other.
But, when the family are going on holiday or visiting another EU state, this
trip is covered under 2004/38/EC
So any required Schengen visas are free, accelerated application
procedure, and every facility must be afforded.
But, if the non-EU family members is travelling alone on holiday or
visiting another EU state , (NOT invoking the directve) then yes,
"standard" Schengen rules apply.
No privileges.
Certain EU states e.g. Romania are not so fussy about the travelling
alone bit, And grant equal privileges to the non-EU family member
regardless if they are accompanied or joining the EU citizen or not.
Whereas other EU states, e.g. Germany are very mean on this restriction.