Post
by nonspecifics » Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:08 pm
That is quite a detailed reason for refusal letter, so that is helpful in telling you exactly what else they need.
It's up to you whether to appeal or not. If it's correct that you never included enough evidence to prove your case, then it is better to re-apply. If going for appeal, oral appeals have much higher rates of success than papers only.
If I were you I would break your evidence into separate categories clearly labelled, so you can properly assess your evidence ( and UKBA can too) as self-sufficiency applications can be a lot more complicated.
You can label them under the separate categories as they listed them in the refusal, if you think that would be simpler or use a list like mine.
There are several things you want to prove.
The first is the EEA was exercising treaty rights as self-sufficient.
Also, proof that he was genuinely resident in the UK - which can be harder for self-sufficients to prove.
As the non-economically active are not clocking-in somewhere ( like a worker does) UKBA can say there is no proof where the person was, as EEA's do not have their passports stamped when leaving and entering the UK if travelling within the EEA area.
You need to make it clear in a cover letter that the EEA was exercising treaty rights as self-sufficient.
To prove EEA is exercising treaty rights as self-sufficient.
1. CSI
Proof of CSI for the EEA and you till date of divorce. The Dutch ehic should do for EEA's CSI. Is your Ehic from UK or where?
2. Proof of sufficient funds
Your payslips, savings and evidence that the EEA benefitted from those funds ( if possible) such as proof you paid bills, paid rent etc till date of divorce.
3. Proof he was resident in the UK. i.e council tax bills showing he is listed in the house would be best if no bills in his name or statements in his name showing withdrawals in the UK or rental agreements or anything else.
e-tickets showing showing any trips were from and back to the UK. It helps to show the EEA was resident at least 6 months in the year in the UK.
Then for your retention of right of residence:
1. Proof of relationship. I think it is Married minimum of three years and at least two before initiating divorce proceedings.
2.Proof both of you living in the UK for one year during your marriage and living in the UK at the time of the divorce.
The gurus have advised before you do not have to prove co-habitation, living with your spouse in the UK means both in the UK. You should prove you were both resident in the UK and had a relationship. Not necessarily in the same house all the time. ( Some people have to work away from home but meet their spouse for romantic weekends together etc).
You can refer to your payslips as also proving you are resident in the UK, though you can have them in the proof of funds bundle of evidence.
3. Proof of divorce.
4. From date of divorce, Proof you then were working as if you were the one exercising treaty rights. Presumably, as you would then be a worker you should not require CSI after the divorce.