- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
yes - the stamp does not make it invalid (it is in any event only a confirmation of her entitlement)Marco 72 wrote:The first question has just been answered in another thread. However, I would still like to know if my wife's PR sticker is still valid.
I wouldn´t know why it should be invalid. However, some other ignorant officier might later claim that the Residence-Permit is an Entry-Permit, and only allows single entry. By now I believe everything is possible.Marco 72 wrote:2. Is my wife's PR sticker still valid, even after having been defaced by the stamp?
While I´d also recommend complaining (also to the Commission under sg-plaintes@ec.europa.eu, please post any reply that may come from it in this forum!), may I ask what´s so bad about filling the landing-card that you would want it returned to you? I never saw it, so I´m just asking out of curiosity!fysicus wrote:I advise to report this incident by email to UKBACustomerComplaints@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk and demand that the original landing card, that you were unlawfully required to complete, be returned to you.
Did she use the EU line or the non-EU line?Marco 72 wrote: the immigration officer at Heathrow
From my experience it DOES matter.keffers wrote:As a slight aside to whether or not a passport should or should not be stamped - why do people have such a problem with it?
Is there a practical reason why it is not desirable? Does it really matter?
I also find stamps a nice souvenir. But the 20th space-consuming re-entry-stamp into your regular country-of-residence doesn´t exactly qualify as a souvenir.keffers wrote:I suppose its understandable for good, practical reasons but on a point of principle I don't think its worth the aggravation. Funny how times change. No too long ago folk couldn't get enough of stamps in their passports as evidence of travel to foreign parts.
Thanks. We are not interested in having the landing card returned. However, we are fed up with the ignorance of many UKBA officers. It's possible that the first officer was new or poorly trained, but I can't accept that a supervisor at Heathrow doesn't know the difference between ILR and EU permanent residence. For us, filling a landing card is not even a minor inconvenience. However, if this is how they treat a US citizen accompanied by her British husband, what prevents them from denying entry on a whim to someone from a third world country with a valid EEA PR or Family Permit? I wonder how many abuses have happened, and gone unreported.ca.funke wrote:While I´d also recommend complaining (also to the Commission under sg-plaintes@ec.europa.eu, please post any reply that may come from it in this forum!), may I ask what´s so bad about filling the landing-card that you would want it returned to you? I never saw it, so I´m just asking out of curiosity!
We always use the EU-EEA line and my wife always gets her passport stamped.Jambo wrote:Did she use the EU line or the non-EU line?Marco 72 wrote: the immigration officer at Heathrow
The IO in the EU line tend not to have stamps at their desks (as they hardly use them) so your changes to get stamped are lower if you use that line.
Of course you aren't. The reason why I suggested to ask it back, is to cause a bit more embarrassment internally. I imagine that at some point somebody has to copy this handwritten information into a computer, and after that the landing card is filed, and will probably become irretrievable (at least from a practical point of view, given the sheer number of landing cards that must have been collected over time). It is just a way of rubbing it in, forcing them to spend much more time on your complaint. If they really would return it, which would enormously surprise me, you would of course just throw it in the bin!Marco 72 wrote:We are not interested in having the landing card returned.
Oh they have them all right, I assure you. Now ink is another thing:)Jambo wrote:Did she use the EU line or the non-EU line?Marco 72 wrote: the immigration officer at Heathrow
The IO in the EU line tend not to have stamps at their desks (as they hardly use them) so your changes to get stamped are lower if you use that line.
Because it's the law and because it takes ages to get a visa and ages to get a residence card and just because.keffers wrote:As a slight aside to whether or not a passport should or should not be stamped - why do people have such a problem with it?
Is there a practical reason why it is not desirable? Does it really matter?
Complain and things will improve. Let it go and things will go on as before.Marco 72 wrote:Thanks. We are not interested in having the landing card returned. However, we are fed up with the ignorance of many UKBA officers. It's possible that the first officer was new or poorly trained, but I can't accept that a supervisor at Heathrow doesn't know the difference between ILR and EU permanent residence. For us, filling a landing card is not even a minor inconvenience. However, if this is how they treat a US citizen accompanied by her British husband, what prevents them from denying entry on a whim to someone from a third world country with a valid EEA PR or Family Permit? I wonder how many abuses have happened, and gone unreported.ca.funke wrote:While I´d also recommend complaining (also to the Commission under sg-plaintes@ec.europa.eu, please post any reply that may come from it in this forum!), may I ask what´s so bad about filling the landing-card that you would want it returned to you? I never saw it, so I´m just asking out of curiosity!
Please, do complain, don't let them get away with it.EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:Complain and things will improve. Let it go and things will go on as before.Marco 72 wrote:Thanks. We are not interested in having the landing card returned. However, we are fed up with the ignorance of many UKBA officers. It's possible that the first officer was new or poorly trained, but I can't accept that a supervisor at Heathrow doesn't know the difference between ILR and EU permanent residence. For us, filling a landing card is not even a minor inconvenience. However, if this is how they treat a US citizen accompanied by her British husband, what prevents them from denying entry on a whim to someone from a third world country with a valid EEA PR or Family Permit? I wonder how many abuses have happened, and gone unreported.ca.funke wrote:While I´d also recommend complaining (also to the Commission under sg-plaintes@ec.europa.eu, please post any reply that may come from it in this forum!), may I ask what´s so bad about filling the landing-card that you would want it returned to you? I never saw it, so I´m just asking out of curiosity!
For the Commission I recommend email.Marco 72 wrote:...but is unsure whether to do it by post or email...
Just complain to UKBA by email (to the adress I quoted earlier in this thread, or the one mentioned in the leaflet you have if that is different). They send an acknowledgement (usually the next day).Marco 72 wrote:My wife is about to submit her complaint, but is unsure whether to do it by post or email. According to the leaflet they gave us at the airport, they seem to prefer email. However, I don't know if we are supposed to include details such as my wife's passport number or her Home Office Reference number - in this case, regular post may be better. What would you recommend?
Hi,fysicus wrote:Of course, under EEA regulations, either with a Residence Card or a Permanent Residence Card, you:
1. can use the queue for UK/EU/EEA passports,
2. do not have to fill in a landing card (all information asked on it, is already known to UKBA)
3. should not get any stamp in your passport
The stamp that your wife did get on this occasion does not invalidate anything, and in fact, it makes it easier to show that you were not out of the UK for more than two years (it proves your presence in the country on the date of the stamp).
I advise to report this incident by email to UKBACustomerComplaints@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk and demand that the original landing card, that you were unlawfully required to complete, be returned to you.
I made a complaint about my spouse's treatment (we were traveling together) and they answered it (and to my satisfaction if I may add). They needed more information before they resolved matters, but I just emailed them the additional info.fysicus wrote:Just complain to UKBA by email (to the adress I quoted earlier in this thread, or the one mentioned in the leaflet you have if that is different). They send an acknowledgement (usually the next day).Marco 72 wrote:My wife is about to submit her complaint, but is unsure whether to do it by post or email. According to the leaflet they gave us at the airport, they seem to prefer email. However, I don't know if we are supposed to include details such as my wife's passport number or her Home Office Reference number - in this case, regular post may be better. What would you recommend?
There is no need to mention passport number or HO number; just be specific about time and place of the incident (flight number will help), so that the IO involved can be traced.
Choose the wording of your complaint such that your wife is the I-person, who actually makes the complaint, and send it from her email address.
I made the mistake to complain myself on my wife's behalf and then they required authorization from my wife to disclose her personal details to me.