- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Thanks for your input Agniukas.agniukas wrote:I don't see anything strange in there. Everyone is being asked for the same documents.
1. Tax credits cert can be submitted when available
2. the landlord has to register their tenancy with PRTB. The PRTB letters then have to be submitted when available.
3. I would query the date of application by email or post to EUTR section. Just to be on the safe side. It's usually 6 months. Chances are it was only a human error, which could be easily corrected.
Good luck
Ref article 10a confirmation of engagement from the employer or a certificate of employment, or
proof that they are self-employed persons;
That might be one way of proving that one is employed, but it is not mandatory and can be proved by other means.EUspouse82 wrote: 1. A recent Tax certificate as proof of employment despite providing an employment contract and payslips; anyway the spouse has since requested for one and is on the way from the revenue office.
No proof of residence is mentioned in the directive. None, it's simply not there.EUspouse82 wrote: 2. Secondly they asked for further proof of residence, they initially submitted original utility bills and rental contracts ((both in their names)) but the INIS insist on a letter from the private residential board- dont know what that is.
he registration certificate or, in the absence of a registration system, any other proof of residence in the host Member State of the Union citizen whom they are accompanying or joining;
Perhaps they can't count.EUspouse82 wrote: 3. And the most intriguing issue is she applied in March and was sent an acknowledgement letter confirming the reciept of the application on 23rd of march 2012. The assumption is that the six months application period will expire in September 2012 but they wrote to her that the application period expires in October 2012 which is 7 months from date of application. Is this legal?
Thanks EUsmile ,EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:Perhaps they can't count.EUspouse82 wrote: 3. And the most intriguing issue is she applied in March and was sent an acknowledgement letter confirming the reciept of the application on 23rd of march 2012. The assumption is that the six months application period will expire in September 2012 but they wrote to her that the application period expires in October 2012 which is 7 months from date of application. Is this legal?
I would say illegal...EUspouse82 wrote:...beyond those required under the directive is a bit disingenuous...
The reason for this is because, payslips and employment contracts can be faked. It is known to have happened. No real panic there, you should be fineEUspouse82 wrote:Hi All,
I am inquiring on behalf of a friend who is married to a French citizen and both living in Ireland. She applied for Non EU residence permit as the spouse of an European in March 2012 and was sent an acknowledgement letter by INIS but they requested for further documents in relation to the application. They requested for:
1. A recent Tax certificate as proof of employment despite providing an employment contract and payslips; anyway the spouse has since requested for one and is on the way from the revenue office.
Landlords are suppose to register their tenants with Private Residential Tenancy Board. Maybe the landlord did not register you, not your fault. Just find out and tell departmentEUspouse82 wrote: 2. Secondly they asked for further proof of residence, they initially submitted original utility bills and rental contracts ((both in their names)) but the INIS insist on a letter from the private residential board- dont know what that is.
You failed to provide FULL documents actually required, hence the month delayEUspouse82 wrote: 3. And the most intriguing issue is she applied in March and was sent an acknowledgement letter confirming the reciept of the application on 23rd of march 2012. The assumption is that the six months application period will expire in September 2012 but they wrote to her that the application period expires in October 2012 which is 7 months from date of application. Is this legal?
And they are in article 10(14) The supporting documents required by the competent authorities for the issuing of a registration certificate or of a residence card should be comprehensively specified in order to avoid divergent administrative practices or interpretations constituting an undue obstacle to the exercise of the right of residence by Union citizens and their family members.
2. For the residence card to be issued, Member States shall require presentation of the following documents:
(a) a valid passport;
(b) a document attesting to the existence of a family relationship or of a registered partnership;
(c) the registration certificate or, in the absence of a registration system, any other proof of residence in the host Member State of the Union citizen whom they are accompanying or joining;
Yes, and all of this is complied with if you properly read the Application form and the list of documents required.EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:Recital 14
And they are in article 10(14) The supporting documents required by the competent authorities for the issuing of a registration certificate or of a residence card should be comprehensively specified in order to avoid divergent administrative practices or interpretations constituting an undue obstacle to the exercise of the right of residence by Union citizens and their family members.
2. For the residence card to be issued, Member States shall require presentation of the following documents:
(a) a valid passport;
(b) a document attesting to the existence of a family relationship or of a registered partnership;
(c) the registration certificate or, in the absence of a registration system, any other proof of residence in the host Member State of the Union citizen whom they are accompanying or joining;
I'm not sure I understand. To me, it would appear that the authorities are requesting or demanding documentation in excess of those specified in the directive.walrusgumble wrote: Yes, and all of this is complied with if you properly read the Application form and the list of documents required.
I'm not sure I understand. To me, it would appear that the authorities are requesting or demanding documentation in excess of those specified in the directive.[/quoteEUsmileWEallsmile wrote:walrusgumble wrote: Yes, and all of this is complied with if you properly read the Application form and the list of documents required.
Explain.EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:I'm not sure I understand. To me, it would appear that the authorities are requesting or demanding documentation in excess of those specified in the directive.walrusgumble wrote: Yes, and all of this is complied with if you properly read the Application form and the list of documents required.
I believed I had.walrusgumble wrote: Explain.
Could you provide a reference for this perhaps?walrusgumble wrote: The Commission Guidelines have also stated that the Authorities are entitled to ask for this stuff
If you re-read recital 14, there is another interpretation and that is that member states are required to use the same supporting documentation to avoid divergent practices.walrusgumble wrote: Return to your citing
"14) The supporting documents required by the competent authorities for the issuing of a registration certificate or of a residence card should be comprehensively specified in order to avoid divergent administrative practices or interpretations constituting an undue obstacle to the exercise of the right of residence by Union citizens and their family members."
That is done , listed at the back of the application form. These documents are easily obtainable
NExt time, do your own researchEUsmileWEallsmile wrote:Could you provide a reference for this perhaps?walrusgumble wrote: The Commission Guidelines have also stated that the Authorities are entitled to ask for this stuff
It can, but the revenue evidence will proof beyond dispute that one is working lawfully, and that the documents one provides are legitimateEUsmileWEallsmile wrote:That might be one way of proving that one is employed, but it is not mandatory and can be proved by other means.EUspouse82 wrote: 1. A recent Tax certificate as proof of employment despite providing an employment contract and payslips; anyway the spouse has since requested for one and is on the way from the revenue office.
On what grounds?EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:I would say illegal...EUspouse82 wrote:...beyond those required under the directive is a bit disingenuous...