John wrote:Indeed that is right, but to those affected it is a departure from the general principle that has been applied, namely apply prior to 9th July and the application will be decided upon all the rules in force prior to 9th July.
After all, for those possibly subject to deportation, the rules from 9th July are a lot tougher.
The paragraph you have quoted is about deportation (i.e. of foreign national who has committed a criminal offence). In such cases there is not really a sense of a person having 'made an application' rather, it is the SSHD who notifies the migrant of her intention to make a deportation order, and then later makes a decision to issue that deportation order. No application has been made by the migrant therefore it follows that when the decison is made to make the order it will be made according to the rules in force at the time. Such people probably wouldn't be making applications under the current family immigration rules so I am not sure this is the really the right thread for discussing this issue as it may confuse matters.
Perhaps more relevent to those making (or who have already made) an application under the current immigration rules (e.g. as a spouse) is that if a decision is made after 9th July, and the current rules are not met (for example, switching requirements are not met, or the applicant hasn't passed the English language test), then the application will not be considered accoring to the current discretionary leave policy, but instead will be considered according to the new '10 year family migration route'.
"Before 9 July 2012 you applied for leave under the rules in force prior to that date, were refused leave but your appeal is allowed on or after 9 July
.
If your appeal against a refusal under other rules (not family) is allowed on or after 9 July 2012 on Article 8 grounds, you will not be granted discretionary leave. You will be granted 30 months’ leave on the new 10 year family route under the new immigration rules."
(Page 70, Appendix E) See also para 133, bullet points 2 and 4 of the
Statement of Intent
whilst this is a departure from the general 'non retrospective' principal, again it is a slightly different issue in that leave on A.8 grounds was granted outside the rules before and in accordance with the discretionary leave policy, whereas now they have incorporated A.8 into the rules, so again it is not quite the same as a person applying under one set of 'rules' and having the application considered under another set.