- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
gaurav76.5 wrote:nope canon123 is wrong...and johnyboy is correct...you need to produce dividend voucher which shows gross dividend and net dividend but since there is 10%tax credit on dividend that part is discarded and you are left with net dividned which is paid from your business account to personal account and that becomes your income
Why are you believing in the above link and not the UKBA one which was posted above.betogether wrote:Addition to above response:
In below link
http://firstmigration.com/visas/uk/tier ... f-employed
"Please note that the figures considered by the Home Office are the gross salary and net dividend."
Thanks and Regards
Betogether
Dividend has to be taken by company profit, and not by adding money as a loan. Though the first option is ok but I will suggest you to be careful as raising such invoices can have other impacts ( eg VAT)betogether wrote: If I use only net dividend I will be with below 55K annual income and I will not get required points - therefore either I will have to run an additional invoice to one of my friends company OR give directors loan to my company so that I can run additional net dividend .
I don't see anything else, but I am not an accountant. As you have a limited company, so you must be having an accountant and he must know the details. So better ask him.betogether wrote: Regarding Additional Invoice or Loaning you suggested the loaning is not an option to increase the dividend so that I will have to raise an additional invoice to be eligible for the Tier 1 visa extension.
Do you see any additional impact apart from VAT?
I mean is this consider as manipulation or something?
Is there any thing legal in this.
In my knowledge if I raise invoice I will have to pay lot of extra money to govt i.e. VAT but is there any impact which is not seen by me?
****************************betogether wrote:Hi Again,
Thanks allot Vikas!
Further to this I am also reading T1 Gerneral Guidence and below section (point 93) is again confusing:
93. If an applicant is self-employed and has chosen to retain the profits within the business, his/her earnings are limited to the share of the business’s net profits to which he/she is entitled. The appropriate proportion of the net profit of the business (that is, after tax and outgoings) can therefore be counted as the gross salary of the applicant. We
will only consider profits made during the appropriate 12-month earnings period for which the applicant is claiming.
Regarding Additional Invoice or Loaning you suggested the loaning is not an option to increase the dividend so that I will have to raise an additional invoice to be eligible for the Tier 1 visa extension.
Do you see any additional impact apart from VAT?
I mean is this consider as manipulation or something?
Is there any thing legal in this.
In my knowledge if I raise invoice I will have to pay lot of extra money to govt i.e. VAT but is there any impact which is not seen by me?
Thanks and Regards
Betogether!
Thank you for the wishes Betogether.betogether wrote:Hi RK,
First of all congratulations!
If you had same issue what figures you used. Did you use gross or net dividend for point calculation?
Hi All, I really appreciate your responses before but topic is still not concluded for me. Point 93 is confusing me from guidelines.
Should I use gross dividend (Net + 10/9) or only Net?
Please help.
Thanks and Regards
Betogether!
I support the above statements as even I got my visa extension based on the same ...it's gross salary+gross dividendtier1-immigrant wrote:The 10% tax on dividend is also counted in your earnings.
So your total earnings = gross salary + net dividend + tax credit on dividend.
I got my extension approved based on this calculation only.
If UKBA do not consider the tax credit, my extension would have been rejected.
Surprise to see different views from senior memembers.