- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
As mentioned before no one can tell you exactly what really goes on in the UKBA with each case. You can only be patient and wait. If you browse the forum you will find loads of people playing the waiting game for one reason or the other. It’s a difficult place to be as the UKBA play with lives and appear at times to be like a runaway train…..Docholiday wrote:Thank you for your comment.
Do applications go back in queue even if they request additional information and it is sent especially if you are provided with a label from a caseworker and you address it ukba including her name and your case ID number?
That there is no prescribed limit on absences from UK under family route does not mean that one can spend almost the entire 2 year probationary period outside the UK and then assume that he/she may still be eligible for settlement.Docholiday wrote:Entry clearance Jan2010.Enterd UK March2010 as spouse of British Citizen. Because of. Contractual obligations left Uk april2010stayed abroad most of the time.reurned UK Dec2010 spent 3 weeks. Returned abroad to fulfil my contractual obligation.returned UK march 2012.
The Immigration Rules do not say that you must have been in the UK for the entire 2 years of your visa or permission to remain. Your application to settle here will be judged on its merits, taking into account your reasons for travel, the length of your absences, and whether you and your partner travelled and lived together while you were outside the UK. If you have spent a limited time abroad in connection with your job, for example, this should not count against you.
Docholiday wrote:The following reasons were also cited as reason for refusal.
1.that I did not provide any cohabitation document or anything linking me to my wife.
Fact : I provided 1. Joint account bank statements.
2. Letter from water company in both our names.
3. Remittance receipts and bank transfer while working abroad.
2. It was also cited that I don't have subsistent marriage despite the fact that I have been married for 30 years and had indicated to caseworker that my wife also travels abroad when I am not here.and reason for working abroad was nature of my work and support my family then.
It is also stated as ground for refusal that I don't intend to live here with my wife now or in future. How on earth do they reach such decision?
Do they foretell the future.
Given the above I am wondering whether it may constitute ground for appeal.
Docholiday wrote:Ajmal
If the reason advanced is that because you are away then your marriage is not subsisting?
What is a subsisting marriage?
In application your spouse makes a declration.
Are the implying my spouse made a false declration ?
I was saying this because the reason advanced is comparing 2 years to thirty years.
But he based his decision on me not providing cohabitation documents which is not true.
Accepting that decision would be agreeing to what is not true.since that also affect consideration under article 8
That is also based on future assumption.
Your posts above regarding your refusal do not mention anything about "decision to remove"?Docholiday wrote:What about decision to remove?
Read also 51.4 Retention of Documents.Chapter 51 - Administrative removal procedures (service of notices)[/url] -> [url=http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/documents/policyandlaw/enforcement/detentionandremovals/chapter51?view=Binary]51.3 Immigration Decision (section 47) wrote:If an appeal is not made, or the appeal is unsuccessful, the individual is liable to detention, restrictions, and removal.