Hi,
I am currently in UK on tier-1 general.
My wife's application for entry clearance as a tier-1 dependent got refused (she applied from Chennai, India) and the reason for refusal is given as 'A Natwest bank statement from May 2012 to Oct 2012 is shown as evidence of funds. This bank statement is not original and therefore each page should be stamped by the issuing bank as required by the immigration rules. However this statement has not been stamped therefore it does not meet the rules'.
I have the funds available in my NatWest bank. The bank assured me that the statements given in the branch doesn't require a signature because it has all the required details on the statement and these statements are accepted by the UKBA Home Office. I have used the same statement for my tier-1 extension in October 2012 successfully and got my extension approved. After my extn, we have applied for my wife on 6th Nov and just received the Notice of Decision today.
I am planning to appeal the decision and seek your advise and guidance on the following questions.
1. If I appeal the decision and submit the original bank statements (with signature from bank) along with my application, would it help my case to turn the decision in our favour?
2. The IAFT2 form says the applicant can have a representative and/or sponsor. Can I be the representative and sponsor and apply from UK?
3. It's huge amount that we paid towards the visa fee and really don't want to apply again but the same time worried how long this whole appeal process will take. Can you guys please advise me on what will be approx turn around time in my case what is the best thing to do in this situation?
I am still confused how come the Sheffield PEO accepted the same NatWest bank statement as maintenance of Funds evidence and the High commission in Chennai refused to accept.
Apologies for the lengthy post.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222