- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
She has both a German and UK issued card. The German card expires in March. The UK card was issued recently.Jambo wrote:1. Only the EEA national needs a health insurance if exercising treaty rights as a student. Does she hold a German EHIC or a UK issued one? It needs to be non UK in order to serve as insurance in the UK. If she didn't have insurance before, her time before would not count to PR (and naturalisation).
While there is no requirement, is it better to do so in order to provide evidence of cohabitation?3. There is no need to provide a tenancy agreement with the application.
Is she certain about that? Did she got it confirmed through an EEA3 application? If not, and if she doesn't have 5 years covered with German EHICs (which as Jambo points out should count as CSI), did she got the registration certification through an EEA1 application when she moved in the UK? If so, when did she got one?ampersand55 wrote:My fiancee is a German citizen. She's been in the UK for six years as a student - first her BA, then MPhil, now her PhD - and has acquired permanent residency automatically.
The UK card is not really going to be useful in this process, but if she has German ones covering the past 6 years, and she hasn't done it yet, she could use them to get the document certifying permanent residency (if I would be her, I'd do that before the expiration).ampersand55 wrote:She has both a German and UK issued card. The German card expires in March. The UK card was issued recently.
She is reasonably certain (as far as an informed layperson can be reading the relevant guidance information), but does not have an EEA3 confirmation. She does have five years with the German EHIC. I don't know about any previous applications she made when moving to the UK. My impression was that she simply flew over and took up her course. I will have to double check this with her.aledeniz wrote:Is she certain about that? Did she got it confirmed through an EEA3 application? If not, and if she doesn't have 5 years covered with German EHICs (which as Jambo points out should count as CSI), did she got the registration certification through an EEA1 application when she moved in the UK? If so, when did she got one?ampersand55 wrote:My fiancee is a German citizen. She's been in the UK for six years as a student - first her BA, then MPhil, now her PhD - and has acquired permanent residency automatically.
She has full funding from the AHRC, paying her fees and a £12,000 annual living stipend. That was for the MPhil and now for the PhD. Her funding expires in September 2013.Also, were the MPhil or especially the PhD paid positions?
I am a layman, and I couldn't advise you one way or another, but my own understanding of EU laws is that once married, if my spouse exercise treaty rights (*), as a non EEA citizen I would be able to legally live and work in the UK without requiring COAs, EEA application, residence cards or what else. So If I would marry the 31st December, I'd feel able to lawfully and legally work the 1st January.ampersand55 wrote:I could ask my employer to start in March rather than February. That would give us more time to get our life (and documentation) set up, but they might not go for that.
This is interesting from a few points of view. I suspect that at that level of compensation she is exempted from paying taxes and contributions, and I wouldn't be surprised if therefore under those circumstances the UKBA would refuse to consider her a worker exercising treaty rights. I am afraid I don't know of anyone who has tested them in a court of law as yet in this point, and given that you seems to have other much better avenues (keep hold of that German EHIC), is probably not going to be productive for you to pursue such a path. On the other hand, I would be surprised if such a stance would survive the judicial test, shame it would take years and probably plenty of money.ampersand55 wrote:She has full funding from the AHRC, paying her fees and a £12,000 annual living stipend. That was for the MPhil and now for the PhD. Her funding expires in September 2013.
I mentioned this on the phone to HR, but they want a CoA followed up by an RC. The CoA sounds like no trouble, pretty automatic. What worries me is being denied the RC after six months of everything going swimmingly, for some ridiculous and easily challenged reason, but losing the job while appealing or reapplying. Then we're both screwed (and probably bankrupt._ I know it's not great applying for EEA2 right after the wedding, in terms of appearances, but that's just how our lives are unfolding.aledeniz wrote:In practice, you often need at least a COA, and more often than not a RC, but I would hope there is some employer out there who understand the law as myself.ampersand55 wrote:I could ask my employer to start in March rather than February. That would give us more time to get our life (and documentation) set up, but they might not go for that.
Right, understood.Jambo wrote:With regards to the proof of residence, then first, thee is no requirement to show cohabitation if you are married. Second, the requirement for proof of residence is not supported by the legislation. It was not apart of the previous version of the application form and I suspect the HO added it to prevent applicants applying for a residence card without actually living in the UK. Any proof of residence in the UK would satisfy the requirements in the form.
Phenomenal - thanks for the tip and all of your help.From the sound of it, it seems your future wife has PR. if she had German EHIC for her first 5 years, it doesn't matter if it expired now. I suggest she applies for PR confirmation (EEA3) together with your application for Residence card (EEA2). It might even reduce the suspicion of your relationship. A German student applying for PR is not your normal party to a sham marriage.
While we hope none of us will ever need to pursue such avenue, if we suffer a loss and we think someone else caused that not acting lawfully, we may still sue them and ask for compensation.ampersand55 wrote:I mentioned this on the phone to HR, but they want a CoA followed up by an RC. The CoA sounds like no trouble, pretty automatic. What worries me is being denied the RC after six months of everything going swimmingly, for some ridiculous and easily challenged reason, but losing the job while appealing or reapplying. Then we're both screwed (and probably bankrupt.