Only for queries regarding Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). Please use the EU Settlement Scheme forum for queries about settled status under Appendix EU
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
-
UKBA HUNTER
- BANNED
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:55 pm
- Location: Ground Floor
Post
by UKBA HUNTER » Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:19 pm
hi,
What does it mean "VALID OUT OF TIME APPLICATION" being written in SAR file based on the situation where all student extension applications have been made in time during 10 years except in one time when student extension had been rejected after 5 months processing and instead of appeal new fresh application had been made just after 5th day of refusal decision and that had been approved within 30 days. Under this situation the 2nd fresh application in Sar report showing these words "valid out of time" but without showing how many days out of time.
-
UKBA HUNTER
- BANNED
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:55 pm
- Location: Ground Floor
Post
by UKBA HUNTER » Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:36 am
Any input
-
Graceofgod
- Member
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:42 pm
Post
by Graceofgod » Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:58 am
UKBA HUNTER wrote:hi,
What does it mean "VALID OUT OF TIME APPLICATION" being written in SAR file based on the situation where all student extension applications have been made in time during 10 years except in one time when student extension had been rejected after 5 months processing and instead of appeal new fresh application had been made just after 5th day of refusal decision and that had been approved within 30 days. Under this situation the 2nd fresh application in Sar report showing these words "valid out of time" but without showing how many days out of time.
Hi
sorry to say this but your second application has been considered as being out of time application. if you had appealed within 10 days of refusal date then it would not have had any issues but you reapplied so it is considered as being out of time.
unfortunately UKBA counts the gap from the expiry date of your previous visa rather than the refusal date.
Information or Advice provided by me is general in nature and based on my own limited expertise hence shouldn't be used as a substitute for professional advice where necessary.
-
quantum1
- Member of Standing
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:31 pm
Post
by quantum1 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:59 am
It means two things. The application was valid. ie it was correct, the money was correct, the form was correct the photos were correct etc. The second thing was that the application was also out of time. ie it was made after limited leave had lapsed.
-
UKBA HUNTER
- BANNED
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:55 pm
- Location: Ground Floor
Post
by UKBA HUNTER » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:17 am
@graceofgod
After the grant of 2nd application extension another psw visa granted later for which 20 points were given for legal stay. And SAR report is showing too that caseworker consulted its supervisor before giving these 20 points for the legal stay (the period when 2nd application lodged). any input from expert vinny/sushmedta-moderator.
-
Graceofgod
- Member
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:42 pm
Post
by Graceofgod » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:36 am
UKBA HUNTER wrote:@graceofgod
After the grant of 2nd application extension another psw visa granted later for which 20 points were given for legal stay. And SAR report is showing too that caseworker consulted its supervisor before giving these 20 points for the legal stay (the period when 2nd application lodged). any input from expert vinny/sushmedta-moderator.
I understand what you mean but prior to October 2012 they were o.k with gaps longer than 28 days for any sort of extensions apart from ILR on 10 years basis and from October 2012 they will refuse any extensions if you apply more than 28 days after the expiry date of your previous visa. According to the IDI guidance for caseworkers they can apply discretion on one -off out of time application for no more than 10 calender days but they will apply discretion if there are other reasons for out of time application which are beyond applicant's control such as postal strikes, admin error from UKBA, hospitalisation due to sickness and so on.
Information or Advice provided by me is general in nature and based on my own limited expertise hence shouldn't be used as a substitute for professional advice where necessary.
-
UKBA HUNTER
- BANNED
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:55 pm
- Location: Ground Floor
Post
by UKBA HUNTER » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:47 am
This happened before october 2012 and on refusal very clearly they given 2 options on refusal letter either to appeal in 10 days or make new fresh application for its reconsideration. So i reapplied on the 5th day and got visa in 30 days followed by another psw visa with no problem later.
-
UKBA HUNTER
- BANNED
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:55 pm
- Location: Ground Floor
Post
by UKBA HUNTER » Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:36 pm
any more expert input
-
sheraz7
- Respected Guru
- Posts: 2509
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:56 pm
- Location: UK
Post
by sheraz7 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:16 pm
I believe you will be fine based on the facts you described.
Please donot send PM. Write in open forum to facilitate others too.
REGARDS
-
vinny
- Moderator
- Posts: 33338
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:58 pm
Post
by vinny » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:39 pm
Section 3C was triggered. So, you were
not out of time for too long.
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given
links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.
-
UKBA HUNTER
- BANNED
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:55 pm
- Location: Ground Floor
Post
by UKBA HUNTER » Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:45 am
vinny wrote:Section 3C was triggered. So, you were
not out of time for too long.
Hello Vinny. Thanks for your time to reply. Since new long residence guidance 2013 came which allow 28 days out of time application. Do you think in above circumstances new guidance will be more favorable.