- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
If you have CSI you are self-sufficient. There is no requirement to be working in any capacity. Obviously you have to work to make money but that's not relevent to the immigration rules.Manimba wrote: does it matter if i'm working only 30hrs a week?
He's been here since 2004, worked till 2008 then been off work till december last year, reason i applied for a new RC had he been employed thru out, i'd have qualified for PR 2011. first child goes to full time school 2nd one starts this september. thanksObie wrote:How long has he been in the UK, and what has he been doing dueing this period, and are your children in Education.
But I suspect that your EEA partner may qualify for PR based on the situation you told that he is here since 2004 and worked till 2008. Then from 2004-2008 he was a worker as long as if he registred with WRS scheme if A8 national and if you got your payslips/savings/his some savings evidence during 2009 then he can argue to be self sufficient without the need of sickness insurance (CSI was introduced in 2011).Manimba wrote:
He's been here since 2004, worked till 2008 then been off work till december last year, reason i applied for a new RC had he been employed thru out, i'd have qualified for PR 2011. first child goes to full time school 2nd one starts this september. thanks
But he never applied as self-sufficient.sheraz7 wrote:But I suspect that your EEA partner may qualify for PR based on the situation you told that he is here since 2004 and worked till 2008. Then from 2004-2008 he was a worker as long as if he registred with WRS scheme if A8 national and if you got your payslips/savings/his some savings evidence during 2009 then he can argue to be self sufficient without the need of sickness insurance (CSI was introduced in 2011).Manimba wrote:
He's been here since 2004, worked till 2008 then been off work till december last year, reason i applied for a new RC had he been employed thru out, i'd have qualified for PR 2011. first child goes to full time school 2nd one starts this september. thanks
Many thanks for your input. I am referring to OP's 1st post too in which she mentioned that she (non-eu) was working and if she was working then her EEA national can argue to become self sufficient on the basis of her wages/her saving during 2009 (if she worked). That is what I mean.Obie wrote:But he never applied as self-sufficient.sheraz7 wrote:But I suspect that your EEA partner may qualify for PR based on the situation you told that he is here since 2004 and worked till 2008. Then from 2004-2008 he was a worker as long as if he registred with WRS scheme if A8 national and if you got your payslips/savings/his some savings evidence during 2009 then he can argue to be self sufficient without the need of sickness insurance (CSI was introduced in 2011).Manimba wrote:
He's been here since 2004, worked till 2008 then been off work till december last year, reason i applied for a new RC had he been employed thru out, i'd have qualified for PR 2011. first child goes to full time school 2nd one starts this september. thanks
In any event, he may have been on benefit, and therefore cannot claim he was indeed self sufficient.
You need to have all the fact, to come to a proper conclusion .
I certainly agree that if you were self-sufficient solely on the basis of benefit payment, then you would not qualify.Obie wrote:You can hardly claim self-sufficient on the basis of benefit payment. It goes against the letter and spirit of the provision, which is to ensure people are not a burden on host state national benefit system.
CSI is part of the EEA regulations since 2006. It wasn't enforced on students (if applied) before 2011. It was enforced on self sufficient (if applied) since 2008.sheraz7 wrote: he can argue to be self sufficient without the need of sickness insurance (CSI was introduced in 2011).
I think that well researched finding presented by EusmileWEallsmile regarding OP's previous refusal will certainly lead to the most relevant solution. well done.EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:@Obie, OP appears to have tried and failed to get PR already (see http://www.immigrationboards.com/viewto ... ht=#775259)
Obie thx for taking time to respond, i'm not trying to apply for PR it was refused and i re-applied for new RC which was granted, my fear is wat happens if hubby stops work, but looks from other posts he can be self-sufficient based on my income then i'll have to take out CSI if he ever gives up work.Obie wrote:Well, if someone is self-Sufficient, then they are most likely not entitled to benefits, at least certain type of benefits, such as income support, disability benefits, etc.
The fact that someone has to claim benefits to support themselves, when they were previusly a worker, and left work and started claiming these benefits.
The burden of proof in Self-Sufficient cases is quite high, and it is on the person claiming such status.
One will need to show that have sufficient resources not to be a burden on the Resources on the host memberstate, and the have CSI.
As stated earlier, without knowing the full circumstances surrounding the OP's husband ceasing his employment, one cannot advice with any certainty, that the OP's wife is entitled to PR under the EEA Regulations or the Citizens Directive.